• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Math.Stackexchange.com question on extending tetration Daniel Fellow Posts: 91 Threads: 33 Joined: Aug 2007 03/28/2021, 06:26 AM Howdy, Check out a question on extending tetration. I'm inviting folks to critic my answers or to provide your own. Daniel JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 571 Threads: 95 Joined: Dec 2010 03/29/2021, 02:11 AM I liked that post. Cool graphics, it's nice to see some love for the standard iteration--and a cool Taylor Series for it. nuninho1980 Fellow Posts: 96 Threads: 6 Joined: Apr 2009 03/30/2021, 03:24 PM (This post was last modified: 03/30/2021, 03:56 PM by nuninho1980.) (03/28/2021, 06:26 AM)Daniel Wrote: Howdy, Check out a question on extending tetration. I'm inviting folks to critic my answers or to provide your own. Daniel I use Maple 2020. base^^x = f(x) = lim n -> infinity (log_base[n](1 - ln(W(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)))^x)*W(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)) + ln(W(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)))*exp_base[n](1))) --> Is this formula correct? But... On Maple -- n = 10 times: - input --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Digits:=20: base:=1.35: x:=2.: log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base](log[base]((1 - ln(LambertW(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)))^x)*LambertW(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)) + ln(LambertW(-ln(base))/(-ln(base)))*base^(base^(base^(base^(base^(base^(base^(base^(base^(base^base))))))))))))))))))); --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - output -------------------------------- 5.8512341052940943912 -------------------------------- --> This output is incorrect... 1.35^^2 = 1.4995142162286330979 --> this is correct. JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 571 Threads: 95 Joined: Dec 2010 03/31/2021, 12:28 AM (This post was last modified: 03/31/2021, 12:29 AM by JmsNxn.) Hey, nuninho1980. I'd take everything Anixx posts with a grain of salt. I can vouch for the Newton series he gives, but not the weird Lambert limit. I'm not sure how he's getting that, lol. The Newton series does converge very very slow though, so his method may have just as slow convergence. Regards, James « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Galidakis & Extending tetration to non-integers Daniel 4 1,297 05/31/2021, 01:26 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Master of Nuclear Math Daniel 0 548 05/18/2021, 11:30 PM Last Post: Daniel Kneser method question tommy1729 9 10,371 02/11/2020, 01:26 AM Last Post: sheldonison A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) Micah 8 11,532 02/18/2019, 10:34 PM Last Post: Micah Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 9,496 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 3,362 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [sci.math] halting problem skeptic. tommy1729 0 3,227 05/30/2015, 09:24 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [MO] Is there a tetration for infinite cardinalities? (Question in MO) Gottfried 10 21,483 12/28/2014, 10:22 PM Last Post: MphLee New thinking about math infinity MikeSmith 0 4,304 10/14/2013, 11:18 AM Last Post: MikeSmith Another question! JmsNxn 4 8,193 08/27/2013, 06:57 PM Last Post: JmsNxn

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)