Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Superroots and a generalization for the Lambert-W
#3
Conjecture 3.1 fails because the left hand side has radius going to 0.

There are 2 ways to show that.

On the other hand conjecture 3.1 does have meaning considering the first n derivatives of the LHS = RHS.

It is a mystery how you intend to solve the cases x^^(3/2) = v though.

Regards

Tommy1729
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Superroots and a generalization for the Lambert-W - by tommy1729 - 11/10/2015, 09:38 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Superroots (formal powerseries) Gottfried 10 14,183 04/05/2011, 03:22 AM
Last Post: Stan
  Infinite towers & solutions to Lambert W-function brangelito 1 3,976 06/16/2010, 02:50 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Lambert W function and the Super Square Root James Knight 3 9,399 10/29/2009, 06:30 AM
Last Post: andydude
  the extent of generalization Matt D 11 12,647 10/15/2007, 04:52 PM
Last Post: Matt D



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)