Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations
Okay, so the question and your intuition relates to the old base change formula and that it failed to be analytic. That makes sense, but is disappointing to think we're going to lose this property if we choose an analytic solution.

So what this slog limit is saying is that for ''good'' analytic tetrations:  changes sign infinitely often (given )?

This reminds me of something.

I've dealt with those limits before and felt discouraged at an ability to prove uniform convergence. Given holomorphic  where , when trying to find a function such that , the natural choice is (which never seems to work). But it sure does look nice.

The only way this works, I found, is to assume and take the Schroder function of both functions where and and then which works locally. Then the above limit for is convergent. But we had to sacrifice a lot to get there. 

Of course if we're working on a non simply connected set instead of and we assumed that had no fixed points on this set, this could work. But tetration takes , so it probably has fixed points (maybe this is provable). Which should guarantee a base change function  is non extendable to .

This is kinda' helping me understand why these functions fail to be analytic. No conjugation can change the multiplier value and clearly will have a different multiplier at its fixed point as will have at its fixed point.

I'll have to read Walker's paper. The only work around I had to this was working with Schroder functions and when dealing with the real line where there are no fixed points I can't imagine a manner of getting a nice uniform convergence.

I'm still wondering if I can prove that if



which could then be a condition for tetration to be non-analytic. 

Still seems like a lot of this is up in the air though. I apologize if this has me a bit scatter brained.

Messages In This Thread
RE: Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations - by JmsNxn - 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Has anyone solved iterations of z+Γ(z)? Leo.W 3 132 10/03/2021, 09:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  On my old fractional calculus approach to hyper-operations JmsNxn 14 2,413 07/07/2021, 07:35 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Master of Nuclear Math Daniel 0 348 05/18/2021, 11:30 PM
Last Post: Daniel question on extending tetration Daniel 3 1,131 03/31/2021, 12:28 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  [exercise] fractional iteration of f(z)= 2*sinh (log(z)) ? Gottfried 4 1,384 03/14/2021, 05:32 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Kneser method question tommy1729 9 9,194 02/11/2020, 01:26 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  [MSE] Shape of orbit of iterations with base b on Shell-Thron-region Gottfried 14 16,953 12/13/2019, 02:33 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) Micah 8 10,550 02/18/2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Micah
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 3,116 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Periodic analytic iterations by Riemann mapping tommy1729 1 4,364 03/05/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)