Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Is bugs or features for super-logarithm?
(08/04/2019, 01:56 PM)sheldonison Wrote: B~=1.98933207608102 + 1.19328219946665*I; 
B=bfromp(4); /* using */
l~=0.540302305868140 + 0.841470984807897*I; 

There is no Schroeder function from this neutral fixed point for base B. even though Kneser Tetration is analytic for base B.  For this base, the multiplier at the fixed point is , which is a period 4 multiplier since

I know how to use the Riemann mapping theorem showing that Kneser exists for real bases at the real axis.  For complex bases, they start with a kernal around the base with a multipier of 1, where the fixed point bifurcates.  For tetration that is eta=exp(1/e). And then one can use the Measurable Riemann mapping theorem to show the Abel function exists.  But this is a pretty recent result in complex dynamics and I don't understand the details in spite of many attempts to read the paper by Lei Tan and Shishikura, reference here:

Just like B, above is not a singularity for Kneser, base exp(-e) with  is not a singularity for Kneser either.  I have no algorithm for calculating results for base(exp(-e)), or to even to get approximate results. I am unaware of anyone else who can do calculations for this base either.  The proofs using both the Riemann mapping theorem and the measurable Riemann mapping are proofs of existence that don't give a usable algorithm for calculations.

Adrienne Douady conjectured the merged Abel function can be analytically extended until you hit the neutral boundary a second time (the Shell Thron boundary for tetration).  I posted a program, which doesn't work anymore with current pari-gp, but there are some interesting results at this link:

Thank you.
by the why, how can I get the photo like this?
i need some code.

Messages In This Thread
RE: For Ember ... boundary conditions and how it works - by Ember Edison - 08/04/2019, 07:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 7,496 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 4,749 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 14,330 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 4,554 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 2,123 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 2,873 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 11,919 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude
  super of exp + 2pi i ? tommy1729 1 3,686 08/18/2013, 09:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  True or False Logarithm bo198214 4 9,857 04/25/2012, 09:37 PM
Last Post: andydude
  Principal Branch of the Super-logarithm andydude 7 14,622 06/20/2011, 09:32 PM
Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)