• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Zeration bo198214 Administrator Posts: 1,386 Threads: 90 Joined: Aug 2007 02/24/2008, 11:02 AM KAR Wrote:Further, from the given legitimacies it is possible to install, that Zeration it is commutative. For this purpose we shall consider two functions at various values $a \ge 2$: $\;\;\;\sqrt[a]{a} = {\rm{var}}\;\;\;\;$ and $\;\;\;\;\log _a \left( a \right) = 1 = {\rm{const}}$ . For operations "division" and "subtraction": $\;\;\;\frac{a}{a} = 1 = {\rm{const}}\;\;\;\;$ and $\;\;\;\;a - a = 0 = {\rm{const}}$. From the reduced example, follows, that inverses operations of type "log" at identical values of argument have constant value. Inverse operation of type "radical" has variable values at a modification of identical arguments and is equal to a constant in case of coincidence with operation of type "log", that is commutabilities. From a limit $\lim \limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {a - n} \right) = a\Delta a = \left( { - \infty } \right)$ follows, that inverse operation of type "radical" for Zeration has unique solution for identical arguments, that is Zeration is commutative. You mean if we have an operation * and we have two inverses / and \, i.e. a=(a*b)/b=(a/b)*b and b=a\(a*b)=a*(a\b), which are equal, i.e. x/y=y\x, then * must be commutative? Hm, then (b*a)/b = b\(b*a) = a and hence b*a=a*b, so thats correct. (Though you didnt even show radical equals log, but rather that the radical type inversion function is constant. That does not necessarily imply that also the radical type equals the log type.) So what you gave is not a derivation, I admit I also love to speculate and think in analogies. However we are here in the mathematical field. Derivations, strict consequences and proofs are the things that count. So after we got some ideas of how things could possibly work, we are not bound to stay at the state of speculation (or to just postulate things without a possibility to verify, as the philosophers do) but we can go to the core and make things manifest: derive things, proving propositions, etc. And that would be what I am really interested in. Quote:bo198214 Wrote:No, thats not a strict consequence. The following is a strict consequence: We start with the axiom ao(ao(ao......))) = a+n for integer n>1 (and a being real or complex) then we conclude ao(a+n)=a+n+1 You write n> 1 and safely expand "n" up to complex? You can seriously make matching of any complex number with 1? Why should I extend this condition to complex n? I just wanted to show that from the by you given conditions, i.e. aoa=a+2 and ao(aoa)=a+3, etc, from which follows ao(a+n)=a+n+1 for n>1, even if we enhance these conditions, by letting n be real, the by you given zeration is not a consequence but rather an example that satisfies these conditions. However that the condition does not contain a complex but only real n, does not mean that zeration itself can not be defined on the complex numbers (though you did not define it on the complex numbers). This would be *my* definition for *complex* $a,b$: $a\circ b = \begin{cases}b+1 & : \Re(b)>\Re(a)+1\\a+2&: \Re(b)\le \Re(a)+1\end{cases}$ Let us verify the conditions: $a\circ a = a+2$ because $\Re(a)\le \Re(a)+1$, let $x>1$ then $a\circ(a+x)=a+x+1$ because $\Re(a+x)>\Re(a)+1$ and for natural $x$ the other conditions follow $a\circ (a\circ a)=a\circ(a+2)=a+3$, etc. « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Zeration - by GFR - 02/14/2008, 06:38 PM RE: Zeration - by Ivars - 02/14/2008, 08:10 PM RE: Zeration - by GFR - 02/14/2008, 10:41 PM RE: Zeration - by mathamateur - 07/30/2009, 06:31 AM RE: Zeration - by Ivars - 02/21/2008, 07:22 PM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 02/21/2008, 09:34 PM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 02/21/2008, 10:18 PM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 02/21/2008, 10:25 PM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 02/21/2008, 11:04 PM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 02/21/2008, 11:12 PM RE: Zeration - by KAR - 02/21/2008, 11:04 PM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 02/21/2008, 11:52 PM RE: Zeration - by GFR - 02/24/2008, 12:39 AM RE: Zeration - by Ivars - 02/24/2008, 02:50 PM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/20/2015, 09:59 PM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 02/24/2008, 11:02 AM RE: Zeration - by GFR - 03/19/2008, 12:40 PM Zeration - My Research / Investigation - by James Knight - 03/25/2008, 08:28 AM RE: Zeration - My Research / Investigation - by bo198214 - 03/25/2008, 09:09 AM More on Zeration - by James Knight - 03/25/2008, 03:44 PM Exponential Laws - New Zeration Law - by James Knight - 03/25/2008, 07:48 PM Delta Numbers As HyperReals - by James Knight - 03/26/2008, 12:50 AM RE: Delta Numbers As HyperReals - by Ivars - 03/26/2008, 12:15 PM RE: Zeration - by GFR - 03/26/2008, 12:22 AM RE: Zeration - by GFR - 04/05/2008, 08:58 PM RE: Zeration - by Igor M - 01/14/2009, 04:04 PM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 01/20/2009, 09:59 PM RE: Zeration - by 73939 - 07/05/2010, 12:00 AM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 07/05/2010, 07:37 AM RE: Zeration - by brangelito - 07/20/2010, 05:51 PM RE: Zeration - by bo198214 - 07/21/2010, 02:58 AM RE: Zeration - by JmsNxn - 11/09/2011, 01:40 AM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 11/09/2011, 04:15 AM RE: Zeration - by JmsNxn - 11/10/2011, 01:20 AM RE: Zeration - by quickfur - 11/10/2011, 02:09 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/20/2015, 09:44 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/20/2015, 10:41 PM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/21/2015, 12:35 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/21/2015, 01:44 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/21/2015, 04:10 AM RE: Zeration - by MphLee - 03/21/2015, 11:53 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/23/2015, 07:58 AM RE: Zeration - by tommy1729 - 03/21/2015, 11:11 PM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/23/2015, 08:05 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/24/2015, 11:29 AM RE: Zeration - by MphLee - 03/23/2015, 09:00 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 03/23/2015, 01:39 PM RE: Zeration - by MphLee - 03/23/2015, 02:31 PM RE: Zeration - by Stanislav - 05/28/2015, 11:12 PM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 05/29/2015, 01:33 AM RE: Zeration - by Stanislav - 05/29/2015, 09:06 PM RE: Zeration - by MphLee - 06/03/2015, 01:40 PM RE: Zeration - by Stanislav - 06/04/2015, 06:44 AM RE: Zeration - by marraco - 06/04/2015, 08:44 PM RE: Zeration - by MphLee - 06/05/2015, 09:10 PM RE: Zeration - by Stanislav - 09/09/2015, 10:04 PM RE: Zeration - by Stanislav - 10/31/2016, 02:57 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Zeration reconsidered using plusation. tommy1729 1 2,847 10/23/2015, 03:39 PM Last Post: MphLee Is this close to zeration ? tommy1729 0 1,930 03/30/2015, 11:34 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2015] 4th Zeration from base change pentation tommy1729 5 5,543 03/29/2015, 05:47 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2015] New zeration and matrix log ? tommy1729 1 3,042 03/24/2015, 07:07 AM Last Post: marraco Zeration = inconsistant ? tommy1729 20 20,697 10/05/2014, 03:36 PM Last Post: MphLee

Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)