Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension
#1
I just read Andrew Robbins' solution to the tetration problem, which I find very convincing, and want to use the opportunity to present and discuss it here.

The solution satisfies the 2 natural conditions
1. and
2. is infinitely differentiable.

However for avoiding difficulties with a later expansion, he instead solves for the tetration logarithm tlog (which he calls super logarithm but I find "tetration logarithm" somewhat more specific), which is the inverse of , i.e. .

The first condition is then translated into
1'. and
while the second condition is equivalent to that also
2'. is infinitely differentiable.

By 1' we merely need to consider the tlog on the interval and can then derive the values for the other intervals , , etc. above and below.

The idea is now that we define a smooth (infinitely differentiable) function t on and ensure that the by 1' resulting function is also smooth at the joining points of the intervals. Obviously it suffices to ensure this for the joining point 0 (and by 1' this transposes to each other joining point).

We simply expand t into a power series at 0 and then try to determine the coefficients such that the resulting function is smooth at 0

is the i-th derivative of t at 0.
The resulting function on is


We have to ensure that for each . What is now the k-th derivative of s at 0?

For we get .
For the constant -1 vanishes and we make the following calculations:

The derivation of is easily determined to be
and so the k-th derivative is , which give us in turn
for .

This is an infinite linear equation system system in the variables .
The way of Andrew Robbins is now to approximate a solution by considering finite linear equation systems consisting of n equations and n variables resulting from letting for .
First one can show that these equation systems have a unique solution for b>1 and numerical evidence then shows that converges and that the resulting are a solution of the infinite equation system.

Further numerical evidence shows, that the infinite sum in the definition of t converges for the so obtained .

However I would guess that the claimed uniqueness for a solution satisfying 1' and 2' is not guarantied. We can use different approximations, for example for a given constant we can consider the equation systems, resulting from letting for . Because interestingly the sum converges to where e is the Euler constant and B_k are the Bell numbers. So by setting for the remaining sum converges and merely introduces an additive constant in the linear equation system. The obtained solutions are different from the solution obtained by c=0.
However I didnt verify yet the convergence properties of these alternative solutions.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Andrew Robbins' Tetration Extension - by bo198214 - 08/07/2007, 04:38 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Possible continuous extension of tetration to the reals Dasedes 0 1,131 10/10/2016, 04:57 AM
Last Post: Dasedes
  Non-trivial extension of max(n,1)-1 to the reals and its iteration. MphLee 3 3,491 05/17/2014, 07:10 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  extension of the Ackermann function to operators less than addition JmsNxn 2 3,688 11/06/2011, 08:06 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Tetration Extension to Real Heights chobe 3 5,687 05/15/2010, 01:39 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  Tetration extension for bases between 1 and eta dantheman163 16 17,013 12/19/2009, 10:55 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  Extension of tetration to other branches mike3 15 18,945 10/28/2009, 07:42 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  andrew slog tommy1729 1 3,180 06/17/2009, 06:37 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Dmitrii Kouznetsov's Tetration Extension andydude 38 34,767 11/20/2008, 01:31 AM
Last Post: Kouznetsov
  Hooshmand's extension of tetration andydude 9 9,729 08/14/2008, 04:48 AM
Last Post: Danesh



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)