Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function)
#24
(08/17/2009, 12:07 PM)jaydfox Wrote:
(08/17/2009, 08:50 AM)bo198214 Wrote: However did we silently switch from base change () to the base change ()?
I think we are more interested in the first one!
Well, they are both important, as singularities in either will be an issue, but I suppose that the change from base eta back to base e should be my more immediate concern.

In theory, most of the principles should be the same. The trivial singularities would be at all branched locations of log^[n-2](1) instead of of log^[n-2](-1), if I'm thinking this through correctly (which I might not be, it's 4 AM here and I just got up to give someone a lift to the airport).
My next question is, how large does k have to get before we encounter singularities? After a very hectic week at work, I'm having an equally hectic time out of town on vacation, and perhaps missed out on a lot of the fun. And still, I don't have time to do this problem proper diligence.

Jay, you confused me converting between base e to eta, instead of eta to e. I agree that the principles are the same, and the singularities seem to be fatal. Also, base eta can be represented as iterated exp(z-1), which is another potential source of confusion. I wanted to step back to the base conversion equation, in the strip where varies from 4.38 to 5.02, which would correspond more or less to sexp_e=0 to 1. The hope was to extend such a strip to the complex plane. I wanted to share a few observations about the singularities in this strip, where z = . Here f(z)=1, which corresponds to sexp_e(0).



As a simplification, we look at this equation, between z=4.38 and z=5.02


I was interested in how large k had to get before we encounter singularities. In this scenario, we first need to find the smallest value of k such that f(z)=e. and ln(ln(ln(e)))=singularity. In this strip, does f(z) for k<=4 reach a value of exactly e or exactly 1? I found some singularities for k=5.

I'm enjoying all the posts; you guys seem to be close to showing the base conversion equation has zero radius of convergence. I don't have enought time while on vacation though.....
- Shel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function - by sheldonison - 08/17/2009, 04:01 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 1,317 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 256 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 2,094 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Degamma function Xorter 0 730 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 2,117 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height Vladimir Reshetnikov 13 10,891 01/14/2017, 09:09 PM
Last Post: Vladimir Reshetnikov
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 11,420 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,420 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 15,425 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM
Last Post: marraco
  Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,349 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)