Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
regular sexp: curve near h=-2 (h=-2 + eps*I)
#1
Just to have a nice picture for the vizualization of that unusual thing "complex heights" I made the following graph with our beloved base b=sqrt(2), where the imaginary part of the height parameter increases from 0 to 2 Pi /log(log(2)).
The latter means simply to rotate the value of the scröder-function for some real h, say, if we get for x0=1 the schröder-value s(x0)= s(1) = -0.632, then we use the rotation of this value in the complex plane by a parameter k in the following way s(1)(k) = -0.632 * exp(i*2*Pi*k/64) for k=0..64 and plug that value into the inverse schröder-function to get the iterate of desired complex height.
This gives ellipses for -2<real(h)< inf , and if the imaginary part of the h- value is not zero we can even plot for real(h) = -3, real(h) = -4 , ... real(h)-> - inf
This gives the following curves for some h with real heights and k=0..64

   

Then I was interested in the behaviour of the curve where the real part is -2. Does it diverge to imaginary +- infinity? Does it converge to real(-inf)? Or will the two parts of the curve converge to parallels of the x-axis (=constant imaginary part)?
I found the result surprising: not only, that it seems, they converge to an imaginary part of +-c where c = Pi/log(2), but also, that in the plot with exponentially scaled x-axis the stepwidth approximates to a constant value.
The "exponentially scaled" x-axis means simply, that the (negative) x-coordinates go into the exponent in b^x, so for x-> -inf I get b^x->0 instead.
In the following graph I took the very small stepwidth of k/2^32 for the imaginary part of h - and whatever small stepwidth I use, it seems always, that the curve approximates that parallels to the x-axis with distant of c.

   

Hmm. I'm not familiar with things like Riemann-sphere, but I remember something like if we take the plot from the euclidean plane to the surface of a sphere, then the infinities meet at one point. Would such translation be useful here too?

Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
regular sexp: curve near h=-2 (h=-2 + eps*I) - by Gottfried - 03/09/2010, 09:47 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  fast accurate Kneser sexp algorithm sheldonison 38 72,104 01/14/2016, 05:05 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  regular vs intuitive (formerly: natural) bo198214 7 10,612 06/24/2010, 11:37 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  regular sexp:different fixpoints Gottfried 6 11,427 08/11/2009, 06:47 PM
Last Post: jaydfox
  sexp(strip) is winding around the fixed points Kouznetsov 8 12,645 06/29/2009, 10:05 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  small base b=0.04 via regular iteration and repelling fixpoint Gottfried 0 2,334 06/26/2009, 09:59 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  sexp and slog at a microcalculator Kouznetsov 0 3,080 01/08/2009, 08:51 AM
Last Post: Kouznetsov
  diagonal vs regular bo198214 16 16,671 05/09/2008, 10:12 AM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)