Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
attracting fixed point lemma
Attracting fixed point lemma, which for base would be:

where is a 1-cyclic function.

The more generalized lemma (obviously unproven) would be that for a given base B, RegularSuper_B(z), which is the entire regular super function, and which is developed from the primary repelling fixed point, and also given an analytic sexp_B(z), with singularities only at negative integers<=-2, sexp(-1)=0 and sexp(0)=1, sexp(z+1)=B^sexp(z), then

Where this gets somewhat interesting, is that for bases <= , sexp(z) is often developed from the attracting fixed point. For example, if B=, then the RegularSuper is entire, developed from the repelling fixed point of L=e at -infinity. And sexp(z) is developed from the attracting fixed point of L=e at +infinity. Which leads to my earlier claim for base eta. The claim is that sexp(z) for base eta exponentially converges to the SuperFunction(z+K) for base eta as imag(z) increases towards +I*infinity. K would be the first term in theta(z). Calculating theta(z) is equivalent to calculating the Kneser/Riemann mapping.

In the case for eta, decays to zero at +I*infinity. This is also the case for sexp(z) base e, where sexp(z) is usually developed from the Kneser/Riemann mapping.

A similar claim could be made for B=sqrt(2), where the two fixed points are L1=2, and L2=4. The regular super function is developed from the upper fixed point of L2=4. The claim would be that:

In this case, for sqrt(2), the period of the regular super function is 19.236, but the period of the sexp(z) is -17.143, so has singularities at n*17.143*I. At z=8.572*I, 1.047i+real valued 1-cyclic function. This real valued 1-cyclic function would be the wobble, where the two slightly differing functions go from f(z)=4 at -infinity, to f(z)=2 at +infinity.

I have started to calculated theta(z) for base sqrt(2), as well as for base eta. I wish I could generate Mike's beautiful .png graphics files! The leftmost contour shows the contour for eta, where the Imag(RegularSuper(z))=Pi*e*i, and real(RegularSuper(z)) goes from -infinity to +finity. maps this contour to sexp(z=-3) to sexp(z=-2). The next contour, z+1, has Imag(z)=0, and real(z) goes from -infity to 0. Mike's recent post got me thinking that this equation might edit: or might not also hold for complex bases, which I hadn't considered earlier. Perhaps Mike's post is an example of a B=complex base, sexp(z) function, not developed from the fixed point, for which the might hold?

I will eventually calculate the theta(z) mapping for eta, and for sqrt(2), and post those numerical results. Again, here's the graph for the contour that needs to be mapped, for .
- Sheldon

Messages In This Thread
attracting fixed point lemma - by sheldonison - 09/14/2010, 04:00 PM
new sexp(z) function for sqrt(2) - by sheldonison - 11/15/2010, 12:40 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  tetration from alternative fixed point sheldonison 22 53,459 12/24/2019, 06:26 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Are tetrations fixed points analytic? JmsNxn 2 6,438 12/14/2016, 08:50 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Derivative of exp^[1/2] at the fixed point? sheldonison 10 20,666 01/01/2016, 03:58 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  [MSE] Fixed point and fractional iteration of a map MphLee 0 3,853 01/08/2015, 03:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  [Collatz] Tommy's collatz lemma tommy1729 0 3,203 09/11/2014, 08:48 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  composition lemma tommy1729 1 4,659 04/29/2012, 08:32 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  lemma 1 tommy1729 2 7,367 06/30/2011, 11:47 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [UFO] Attracting Fixpoints or attracting line? Gottfried 17 37,239 04/27/2010, 11:06 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Complex fixed points of base-e tetration/tetralogarithm -> base-e pentation Base-Acid Tetration 19 48,238 10/24/2009, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Uniqueness of tetration. Small lemma. Kouznetsov 9 15,057 04/14/2009, 01:20 AM
Last Post: Kouznetsov

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)