• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Precision check on [pentation.gp] SOLVED sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 668 Threads: 24 Joined: Oct 2008 06/28/2011, 02:33 PM (This post was last modified: 06/28/2011, 07:01 PM by sheldonison.) (06/28/2011, 07:17 AM)Cherrina_Pixie Wrote: .... I ran through the loops for of base ~4.81 and somehow, the indeterminacy of the 13th loop exceeded that of the 12th loop. Is there a way to solve this issue without changing the base? I'm not exactly certain about the possible consequences of this, other than the likely limit of precision... is a result like this 'normal' for larger bases?The problem is with the tetration/sexp code (which is used by pentation.gp). I haven't seen this bug before in kneser.gp, despite having tried a large number of different bases from 1.45 to 100,000 or so. But this particular base, exp(pi/2), seems to be a problem. I don't yet know why. Although in earlier versions of kneser.gp I saw it when pari-gp wasn't carrying out calculations with enough precision -- although I've fixed all of those bugs by manually updating the precision for the samples used to generate theta(z). I tried a few things, but this particular base seems to stop converging around 80 or 90 binary bits of precision (depending on which algorithm I use). I don't understand it yet, and I'm somewhat concerned that this means many other bases don't converge either. I know the error term is approximately a linear dot product from one iteration to the next -- I'm going to try some experiments and I'll report back results later. Small update: The fixed point, L, for $b=\exp(\pi/2)$, has L=i, with $\Re(L)=0$. I don't know what is special about the fixed point of L=i. I tried literally hundred of random bases between 1.5 and 10, (mostly using a faster version of kneser.gp, which uses a Taylor series for the Schroeder function and its inverse which is 3x faster than the version here). All of the random bases converged, so the problem is isolated. Then I tried bases nearby $b=\exp(\pi/2)+\delta$. Using the default kneser.gp precision (\p 67), I get failures $b=\exp(\pi/2)+10^{-25}$, but not for larger values of delta. Using a higher precision, \p 134, I get failures for $\delta=10^{-28}$, but where the precision plateaus depends on how small delta is. I'll report some graphs later; hopefully I'll start to make some sense of what's going, and why this one particular base may not converge .... - Sheldon « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Precision check on [pentation.gp] SOLVED - by Cherrina_Pixie - 06/28/2011, 07:17 AM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by sheldonison - 06/28/2011, 02:33 PM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by JmsNxn - 06/29/2011, 02:42 AM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by sheldonison - 06/29/2011, 05:05 AM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by sheldonison - 06/29/2011, 10:36 PM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by sheldonison - 06/30/2011, 06:00 AM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by sheldonison - 07/01/2011, 10:56 PM RE: Precision check on [pentation.gp] fails? - by Cherrina_Pixie - 07/02/2011, 01:39 AM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Attempt to find a limit point but each step needs doubling the precision... Gottfried 15 32,143 11/09/2014, 10:25 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Expansion of base-e pentation andydude 13 38,118 07/02/2011, 01:40 AM Last Post: Cherrina_Pixie How to force precision in SAGE? jaydfox 2 7,682 08/18/2007, 11:08 PM Last Post: jaydfox

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)