• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,438 Threads: 349 Joined: Feb 2009 02/21/2013, 11:37 PM I came to realise that I am close to a proof that any formula of the form lim n-> oo ln^[n](f^[x](exp^[n])) for f^[1] entire , cannot be analytic. For certain the probability is at most 1/R where R is the cardinality of the continuum. « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... - by tommy1729 - 02/20/2013, 10:37 PM RE: On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... - by tommy1729 - 02/20/2013, 10:50 PM RE: On replacing 2sinh(2 x) with F(x) ... - by tommy1729 - 02/21/2013, 11:37 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 4,483 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM Last Post: sheldonison 2sinh^[r](z) = 0 ?? tommy1729 0 2,309 02/23/2016, 11:13 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2014] Representations by 2sinh^[0.5] tommy1729 1 3,827 11/16/2014, 07:40 PM Last Post: tommy1729 fake id(x) for better 2sinh method. tommy1729 5 8,426 06/05/2014, 08:21 AM Last Post: tommy1729 exp^[1/2](x) uniqueness from 2sinh ? tommy1729 1 3,761 06/03/2014, 09:58 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Is the half iterate of 2sinh(x) analytic near R ? tommy1729 1 3,825 03/13/2013, 12:13 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Another asymptotic development, similar to 2sinh method JmsNxn 0 3,640 07/05/2011, 06:34 PM Last Post: JmsNxn

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)