Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660?
Can it have a Tetration superfunction with sexp(-1)=0, sexp(0)=1, sexp(1)=b, sexp(2)=b^b? This is a base on the shellthron boundary, with one fixed point where and

This base has a rationally indifferent multiplier=-1, which has a pseudo period=2. Because the multiplier is an exact root of unity, rather than an irrational root of unity, this base doesn't have a Schroeder function.

Iterating this function starting with z=1 doesn't lead to behavior that seem much like Tetration. I was curious if it was possible to generate an sexp(z) solution given that I think there is only one fixed point, and that the fixed is rationally indifferent, in this case with a pseudo period of 2.

As I understand it, the abel function for this function, would be generated from b^b^z. If you iterate the b^z function twice, b^b^z would be a parabolic case with an Abel function for each of the four leaves on the Leau-Fatou flower. But I don't know how you can combine these four Abel functions together into a single inverse abel function for b^z. Note in the equation below, that there is no x^2 term.

At the real axis starting close to the fixed point and iterating twice always gets you a little bit closer to the fixed point, but the convergence is very slow. For example, starting with z=0, iterating z=b^z oscillates towards the fixed point.

I generated some results and graphs for a complex base on the shellthron boundary with a rationally indifferent fixed point with a multiplier of , with a pseudo period=5, which also lacks a Schroeder function because the multiplier is a 5th root of unity; the other fixed point is repelling. See post #10 of this thread, This result was generated via the conjectured merged complex tetration solution, using both fixed points of the base. It seems that if there is a solution for other rationally indifferent roots of unity on the Shell Thron boundary, than there could be a solution for this base as well.

In the upper half of the complex plane, such a solution for base (1/e)^e might only be well behaved near the imaginary axis, exponentially converging towards the fixed point as increases much like the conjectured solution with pseudo period=5. Such a solution would become increasingly chaotic as real(z) increased or decreased. I have no idea what the solution could look like in the lower half of the complex plane, since I think there is only one fixed point.
- Sheldon

Messages In This Thread
sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660? - by sheldonison - 03/06/2013, 11:57 PM
RE: sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660? - by mike3 - 03/08/2013, 06:18 AM
RE: sexp for base (1/e)^e ~= 0.0660? - by mike3 - 03/09/2013, 06:00 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,646 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 3,936 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  pseudo2periodic sexp. tommy1729 0 1,871 06/27/2014, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 2,912 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Multiple exp^[1/2](z) by same sexp ? tommy1729 12 14,113 05/06/2014, 10:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 8 9,727 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is sexp(z) pseudounivalent for Re(z) > 0 ? tommy1729 3 3,524 03/26/2014, 01:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 1,775 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 56,444 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  sexp by continuum product ? tommy1729 6 8,825 06/30/2011, 10:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)