• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 entire function close to sexp ?? tommy1729 Ultimate Fellow Posts: 1,370 Threads: 335 Joined: Feb 2009 04/30/2014, 12:23 PM (04/29/2014, 11:21 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: (04/29/2014, 09:25 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: Im a bit puzzled by the " -s ". e^[3] = e^(e^e) But e^[-3] = ln(ln(ln(1))) = ln(ln(0)) = ?? So I do not know what the "-s" means. However your last formula seems to end that problem so it seems $\frac{1}{(^s e)} \approx \psi(s) = \frac{1}{\Gamma(-s)} (\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{(-1)^n}{n!(^n e)(n-s)} + \int_1^\infty e^{-\lambda w}\vartheta(-w)w^{-s-1}\,dw)$ Is the kind of formula we look for. However, Im more concerned about wheither or not this is analytic !? Convergeance is an intresting subject, but if it is analytic somewhere then by analytic continuation we can extend it. But why should that be analytic ? Assuming it is analytic then its derivative must equal the term by term derivative. Can you show it - the term by term derivative formulation - converges ? Actually I bet that this function is not analytic and I even bet sheldon agrees with me. Intresting though. But I suspect you have mentioned this function before, not ? regards tommy1729 very easy to see this is analytic. No idea what you're talking about. lol. Mellin transform of an entire function is analytic. Multiply it by the inverse gamma which is entire and voila, analytic and entire. I'd explain why but it's literally an excercise in analysis 101. These are all uniform limits of analytic functions, so it's neessarily analytic. Your right, sorry. So it is analytic. To be entire it needs to be analytic everywhere , what requires that it converges everywhere. regards tommy1729 « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread entire function close to sexp ?? - by tommy1729 - 04/26/2014, 12:23 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by tommy1729 - 04/27/2014, 03:53 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by JmsNxn - 04/29/2014, 05:47 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by tommy1729 - 04/29/2014, 09:25 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by JmsNxn - 04/29/2014, 11:21 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by tommy1729 - 04/30/2014, 12:23 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by JmsNxn - 04/30/2014, 03:49 PM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by sheldonison - 04/30/2014, 10:56 AM RE: entire function close to sexp ?? - by tommy1729 - 04/30/2014, 12:26 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post New mathematical object - hyperanalytic function arybnikov 4 1,065 01/02/2020, 01:38 AM Last Post: arybnikov Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 674 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM Last Post: Chenjesu Degamma function Xorter 0 1,126 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM Last Post: Xorter Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,806 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 18,689 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM Last Post: marraco Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 4,014 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Transc entire = exp a + exp b + exp c tommy1729 0 1,779 07/15/2015, 07:37 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy-Mandelbrot function tommy1729 0 2,182 04/21/2015, 01:02 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Is this close to zeration ? tommy1729 0 2,290 03/30/2015, 11:34 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Can sexp(z) be periodic ?? tommy1729 2 4,201 01/14/2015, 01:19 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)