Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Theorem on tetration.
Hey everyone. I thought I'd post this theorem, perhaps someone has some uses for it.


A.) If is holomorphic for for some and for and .

B.) for some and we have

Then, for we have


Well this is rather easy:

Which follows by cauchy's residue formula and the bounds of F (the gamma function along with x small enough pulls the arc next to our line integral to zero at infinity). For those who don't see,

where the right term is entire in z and only contribute asymptotics, observe stirlings asymptotic formula

Therefore this holds.

Now observe that by a similar argument:

And of course, by another similar argument:

Therefore since the kernel of this integral transform is zero (its a modified fourier transform). On the line we have . Therefore since both functions are analytic we get the desired.

I'm wondering, does anyone see any uses for this?

I know with some formal manipulation we can say that, if and and is holo and is invertible which satisfies the bounds above. Then

Messages In This Thread
Theorem on tetration. - by JmsNxn - 06/09/2014, 02:47 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Theorem in fractional calculus needed for hyperoperators JmsNxn 5 6,185 07/07/2014, 06:47 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? tommy1729 1 2,671 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Vincent's theorem and sin(sexp) ? tommy1729 0 1,643 03/22/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  number theory EPNT : extended prime number theorem tommy1729 0 1,884 08/23/2012, 02:44 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Carlson's theorem and tetration mike3 8 9,113 08/22/2010, 05:12 AM
Last Post: bo198214
  Weak theorem about an almost identical function: PROOF Kouznetsov 3 5,324 11/14/2008, 01:11 PM
Last Post: Kouznetsov

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)