• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 664 Threads: 23 Joined: Oct 2008 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM (This post was last modified: 06/18/2014, 02:34 PM by sheldonison.) (06/17/2014, 12:18 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: Let sexp(z) be a solution that is analytic in the entire complex plane apart from z=-2,-3,-4,... if w is a (finite) nonreal complex number such that sexp ' (w) = 0 then it follows that for real k>0 : sexp ' (w+k) = 0. Proof : chain rule exp^[k] is analytic : sexp(w+k) = exp^[k](sexp(w)) sexp ' (w+k) = exp^[k] ' (sexp(w)) * sexp ' (w) = 0 .... Hence we get a contradiction : sexp is not nonpolynomial analytic near w (or w + k). Conclusion there is no w such that sexp'(w) = 0. http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...452&page=2 see post#19 and post#20, for the Taylor series of an sexp(z) function with first and second derivatives, sexp'(n)=0 and sexp''(n)=0, for all integers n>-2. This is sexp(z) from the secondary fixed point, analytic in the upper and lower halves of the complex plane. Where the derivative of sexp(x)=0, the slog(z) inverse has a cuberoot(0) branch singularity. The flaw in your proof is that k is an integer, but you state k as a real number. "sexp ' (w+k) = exp^[k] ' (sexp(w)) * sexp ' (w) = 0". For k as a fraction, the chain rule does not apply. A simple counter example to your proof is f(z), which has f'(n)=0 and f''(n)=0 for all integers>-2. $f(z) = \text{sexp}(z - \frac{sin(2\pi z)}{2\pi})$ As a side note, $f^{-1}(z)$ has a cube root branch singularity for n>=0, at $z=\exp^{on}(0)$. This is relevant since the exp^k(z) function used in the flawed proof is $f(f^{-1}(z)+k)$ - Sheldon « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? - by tommy1729 - 06/17/2014, 12:18 PM RE: [2014] tommy's theorem sexp ' (z) =/= 0 ? - by sheldonison - 06/17/2014, 01:25 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Tommy's Gaussian method. tommy1729 18 337 Yesterday, 12:24 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Some "Theorem" on the generalized superfunction Leo.W 29 2,840 06/25/2021, 09:42 PM Last Post: Leo.W " tommy quaternion " tommy1729 13 3,085 03/23/2021, 01:21 PM Last Post: tommy1729 tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 4,603 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM Last Post: sheldonison Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 2,937 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy's matrix method for superlogarithm. tommy1729 0 3,040 05/07/2016, 12:28 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Dangerous limits ... Tommy's limit paradox tommy1729 0 3,190 11/27/2015, 12:36 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy's Gamma trick ? tommy1729 7 11,289 11/07/2015, 01:02 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy triangles tommy1729 1 3,700 11/04/2015, 01:17 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy-Gottfried divisions. tommy1729 0 2,824 10/09/2015, 07:39 AM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)