Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents.
#6


So, we can define the n root of "a" this way


Tetration exponent product is non commutative. In general:



The inequality stands as long as m ≠ n, so if a product is defined to operate on tetration exponents, it is not the common product, or it do not operates on the complex field, or results are multivalued to preserve the equality.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. - by marraco - 03/19/2015, 12:47 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Minimum axioms to extend tetration Daniel 0 118 07/21/2019, 11:38 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 1,963 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Spiral Numbers tommy1729 9 7,298 03/01/2016, 10:15 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Fractionally dimensioned numbers marraco 3 3,244 03/01/2016, 09:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,067 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Tommy's conjecture : every positive integer is the sum of at most 8 pentatope numbers tommy1729 0 1,942 08/17/2014, 09:01 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 19,210 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  About real limits tommy1729 1 2,177 09/23/2013, 09:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Number theoretic formula for hyper operators (-oo, 2] at prime numbers JmsNxn 2 3,679 07/17/2012, 02:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  A notation for really big numbers Tai Ferret 4 6,819 02/14/2012, 10:48 PM
Last Post: Tai Ferret



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)