Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
question about regular iteration, also about tetration properties in general
#1
Could anyone tell me what "regular iteration" means? just generally, not for any specivic method.
Reply
#2
(05/03/2009, 02:49 AM)Tetratophile Wrote: Could anyone tell me what "regular iteration" means? just generally, not for any specivic method.

Its regular if the iterates are differentiable (or at leas asymptotically differentiable) at the fixed point. This implies that .

Perhaps you have tried that already yourself: If you try graphically find the half iterate you start at a certain interval and then continue to the right and to the left. Depending how you choose the function on the initial segment, the function gets more wobbly or more smooth. Without a fixed point I dont know a criterion of the most unwobbly function, however at the fixed point you can express this unwobblyness by being differentiable.

For the wobblyness of a function without fixed point see the pictures made by Gottfried in the thread another uniqueness musing.
Reply
#3
(05/03/2009, 07:05 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Its regular if the iterates are differentiable (or at leas asymptotically differentiable) at the fixed point. This implies that .

do you mean that the derivative of the function iterated times at the fixed point is the derivative at the fixed point to the power (multiplied t times)?
Reply
#4
(05/04/2009, 04:23 AM)Tetratophile Wrote:
(05/03/2009, 07:05 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Its regular if the iterates are differentiable (or at leas asymptotically differentiable) at the fixed point. This implies that .

do you mean that the derivative of the function iterated times at the fixed point is the derivative at the fixed point to the power (multiplied t times)?

exactly. You see that is satisfied for natural numbered iterations:


.
Reply
#5
(05/04/2009, 04:00 PM)Ansus Wrote: Is any point where f(x)=x - fixed point?
Yes, thats the definition.
Reply
#6
So, Andysus bo198214, ? Where do you get from this to derive your tetration?

Does , as in Kouznetsov's, in your tetration?

Also, how does one get the differential equation ?

Edit: Oh, it comes from the definition of tetration.


Reply
#7
(05/05/2009, 03:27 AM)Tetratophile Wrote: So, Andy, ...

I think you confused the names. Ansus not Andy was the main participant in this thread.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) Micah 8 1,444 02/18/2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Micah
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 2,974 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Complaining about MSE ; attitude against tetration and iteration series ! tommy1729 0 1,397 12/26/2016, 03:01 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,370 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MO] Is there a tetration for infinite cardinalities? (Question in MO) Gottfried 10 10,858 12/28/2014, 10:22 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form Gottfried 7 7,763 09/29/2014, 11:39 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Another question! JmsNxn 4 3,805 08/27/2013, 06:57 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Very curious question JmsNxn 3 3,350 08/20/2013, 08:56 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  regular tetration base sqrt(2) : an interesting(?) constant 2.76432104 Gottfried 7 8,250 06/25/2013, 01:37 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Question about curvature tommy1729 0 1,528 12/15/2012, 11:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)