Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 2.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 real fixpoints ... 3 iterations ?
#1
ok , first i dont know if this has been asked or answered before , so forgive my ignorance if such is the case.

consider an analytic function f(z) , strictly rising on the reals with 2 real fixpoints.

now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too )

sketch :

[ - oo .. zone 1 .. fixpoint 1 .. zone 2 .. fixpoint 2 .. zone 3 .. + oo ]

when expanded at fixpoint 1 and missing the fixpoint 2 ( and radius oo ) i consider that regular half-iterate as a correct solution to 'zone 1'

similarly :

when expanded at fixpoint 2 and missing the fixpoint 1 ( and radius oo ) i consider that regular half-iterate as a correct solution to 'zone 3'


So the question becomes , what gives zone 2 ?


Regards

Tommy1729
Reply
#2
(08/08/2009, 11:31 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too )

sketch :

[ - oo .. zone 1 .. fixpoint 1 .. zone 2 .. fixpoint 2 .. zone 3 .. + oo ]

regular iteration at fp 1 is valid at zone 1&2 and regular iteration at fp 2 is valid at zone 2&3.
Reply
#3
(08/09/2009, 12:27 AM)bo198214 Wrote:
(08/08/2009, 11:31 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: now we can use regular iteration for each fixpoint and thus get two ' zones ' that are ' correct ' half-iterates. ( assuming radius = oo too )

sketch :

[ - oo .. zone 1 .. fixpoint 1 .. zone 2 .. fixpoint 2 .. zone 3 .. + oo ]

regular iteration at fp 1 is valid at zone 1&2 and regular iteration at fp 2 is valid at zone 2&3.

no , you assume regular iteration at fp1 touches fp 2 , what if it doesnt ?
Reply
#4
(08/10/2009, 11:03 PM)tommy1729 Wrote:
(08/09/2009, 12:27 AM)bo198214 Wrote: regular iteration at fp 1 is valid at zone 1&2 and regular iteration at fp 2 is valid at zone 2&3.

no , you assume regular iteration at fp1 touches fp 2 , what if it doesnt ?
But wouldn't that necessitate another fixed point between fp1 and fp2? Why else would regular iteration from fp1 not reach fp2? By your original stipulation, the function is strictly increasing (except, of course, at the fixed points). If it does not get from fp1 to fp2, there must be some point (which we can find by taking the limit of infinite iterations) which is a fixed point.
~ Jay Daniel Fox
Reply
#5
(08/10/2009, 11:20 PM)jaydfox Wrote:
(08/10/2009, 11:03 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: no , you assume regular iteration at fp1 touches fp 2 , what if it doesnt ?
But wouldn't that necessitate another fixed point between fp1 and fp2? Why else would regular iteration from fp1 not reach fp2? By your original stipulation, the function is strictly increasing (except, of course, at the fixed points). If it does not get from fp1 to fp2, there must be some point (which we can find by taking the limit of infinite iterations) which is a fixed point.

Exactly.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Merged fixpoints of 2 iterates ? Asymptotic ? [2019] tommy1729 1 63 09/10/2019, 11:28 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  [MSE] Shape of orbit of iterations with base b on Shell-Thron-region Gottfried 3 242 08/18/2019, 02:22 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 2,974 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 1,955 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 fixpoints , 1 period --> method of iteration series tommy1729 0 1,235 12/21/2016, 01:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 fixpoints related by power ? tommy1729 0 1,244 12/07/2016, 01:29 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Periodic analytic iterations by Riemann mapping tommy1729 1 1,921 03/05/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,045 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Fixpoints a,b with f ' (a) = f ' (b) = 1 tommy1729 0 1,449 09/15/2015, 08:29 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Limit of mean of Iterations of f(x)=(ln(x);x>0,ln(-x) x<0) =-Omega constant for all x Ivars 10 13,618 03/29/2015, 08:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)