Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
fourier superfunction ?
#1
the idea of slog(e^x) = slog(x) + 1 in terms of taylor series has been around for a while.

i propose to consider f(e^x) = f(x) + exp(x).

since exp(x) =/= 0 , f(e^x) =/= f(x).

thus f has no "fixed point" of e^x.

now instead of trying taylor on both sides of the equation ,

how about using fourier series on one side ? afterall we have a periodic function !

define f(0) = some real A with A as you wish ! (whatever makes the equations the easiest )

thus we could set the values of the fourier coefficients equal to those of the taylor series :

keeping in mind that we have 'expressions' for n'th derivate ( taylor ) and fourier coefficients.

( in fourier ) f(exp(x)) - exp(x) = ( in taylor ) f(x).

nth fourier coef = nth taylor coef.

it follows that f(-oo) = f(0) ( and = A ) thus i would expand f(x) at x >= 0 and consider it valid only for real z >= 0.

i guess A can be 0....

maybe this is related to kouznetsov and/or andrew slog ?

it certainly seems to have similar properties at first sight ...

not everything is totally clear to me though ... hoping to be correct ...

regards

tommy1729
Reply
#2
can be expressed as a Fourier series, but then how do you express the right hand side? If it's a Taylor series, you can't just equate coefficients, since what they're multiplying is different! E.g. . Just because the coefficients are equal doesn't mean the terms are equal. Equating coefficients of the two distinct series types will not produce a solution of the equation. I don't see what you're trying to get at here...
Reply
#3
(06/23/2010, 01:20 AM)mike3 Wrote: can be expressed as a Fourier series, but then how do you express the right hand side? If it's a Taylor series, you can't just equate coefficients, since what they're multiplying is different! E.g. . Just because the coefficients are equal doesn't mean the terms are equal. Equating coefficients of the two distinct series types will not produce a solution of the equation. I don't see what you're trying to get at here...

yes , but the thing is this : we compute the fourier coefficients with the taylor expression and the n'th derivate of the four series.

this crossed self-reference might be solvable directly or recursively.

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Natural cyclic superfunction tommy1729 3 2,789 12/08/2015, 12:09 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [2014] Uniqueness of periodic superfunction tommy1729 0 1,814 11/09/2014, 10:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [integral] How to integrate a fourier series ? tommy1729 1 2,379 05/04/2014, 03:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  twice a superfunction tommy1729 5 5,075 03/26/2014, 03:34 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  The fermat superfunction tommy1729 3 3,536 03/24/2014, 12:58 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Uniqueness of Ansus' extended sum superfunction bo198214 4 6,362 10/25/2013, 11:27 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  2*sinh(3^h*asinh(x/2)) is the superfunction of (...) ? Gottfried 5 5,173 09/11/2013, 08:32 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  superfunction contain fix ? tommy1729 2 3,314 10/07/2010, 12:14 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  closed form for regular superfunction expressed as a periodic function sheldonison 31 30,019 09/09/2010, 10:18 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Fourier transform of a tetration function Ivars 8 10,416 01/13/2010, 12:09 AM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)