Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Question about tetration limit
#1
Hi.

Consider the limit of tetration as from the right, along the real axis (Here, we use the Kneser/etc. tetrational). The tetrational looks to converge to the parabolic attracting regular iteration at base . This suggests that the resulting fractional iterates of converge to the attracting parabolic regular iterates of base when . But what about ? Does it converge to the iterates obtained from the "cheta" function ?
Reply
#2
if eta^eta^...x >> e then no.

this resembles the base change idea , if two bases are close it works better unless one base is smaller than eta and the other is bigger.
Reply
#3
(07/13/2011, 03:17 AM)mike3 Wrote: Hi.

Consider the limit of tetration as from the right, along the real axis (Here, we use the Kneser/etc. tetrational). The tetrational looks to converge to the parabolic attracting regular iteration at base . This suggests that the resulting fractional iterates of converge to the attracting parabolic regular iterates of base when . But what about ? Does it converge to the iterates obtained from the "cheta" function ?

I think if you recenter the tetrations for different bases>eta, all at the same point, and if the value chosen to recenter at, f(x), is large enough, then the answer may be that it does converge to .

For example the upper superfunction at base eta, , can be centered so that . If you take the limit for f(x)=sexp(x) for bases>eta, but approaching eta, all equivalently recentered so that f(0)=2e, then it seems that the sequence of functions would converge arbitrarily closely, so that in the limit, f(x) converges to the function. I think this would hold in the complex plane as well. The key is that the real part of the pseudo period for sexp for bases approaching but greater than eta gets arbitrarily large. Recentering at 2e, convergence might hold for a little less than half a psuedo period on the left, which is approximately where the inflection point is for sexp(x). This is mostly speculation, btw.
- Sheldon
Reply
#4
and i agree with sheldon.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) Micah 8 1,444 02/18/2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Micah
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 2,974 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 1,369 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Dangerous limits ... Tommy's limit paradox tommy1729 0 1,695 11/27/2015, 12:36 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tetration limit ?? tommy1729 40 42,893 06/15/2015, 01:00 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Limit of mean of Iterations of f(x)=(ln(x);x>0,ln(-x) x<0) =-Omega constant for all x Ivars 10 13,621 03/29/2015, 08:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Another limit tommy1729 0 1,410 03/18/2015, 06:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MO] Is there a tetration for infinite cardinalities? (Question in MO) Gottfried 10 10,853 12/28/2014, 10:22 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  A limit exercise with Ei and slog. tommy1729 0 1,762 09/09/2014, 08:00 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MSE] The mick tommy limit conjecture. tommy1729 1 2,342 03/30/2014, 11:22 PM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)