05/26/2015, 12:28 PM
Im thinking about exp^[0.5](x + 2 pi i)  exp^[0.5](x).
I have little time.
But some ideas.
regards
tommy1729
I have little time.
But some ideas.
regards
tommy1729
exp^[0.5](x + 2 pi i)  exp^[0.5](x)

05/26/2015, 12:28 PM
Im thinking about exp^[0.5](x + 2 pi i)  exp^[0.5](x).
I have little time. But some ideas. regards tommy1729
05/27/2015, 07:00 PM
(05/26/2015, 12:28 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: Im thinking about exp^[0.5](x + 2 pi i)  exp^[0.5](x).Hmmm can it be 2*pi*i periodic? Like exp? I can only compute that from my c++ tet(ate(x)+0.5) .... tet(ate(x)+1) > exp(x) is 2*pi*i periodic, hmmm
Fuji GSW690III
Nikon D3, Nikkors 1424/2.8, 24/1.4, 35/2, 50/1.4, 85/1.4, 135/2, 80200/2.8
12/30/2015, 04:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 12/30/2015, 04:31 PM by sheldonison.)
(05/27/2015, 07:00 PM)MorgothV8 Wrote:(05/26/2015, 12:28 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: Im thinking about exp^[0.5](x + 2 pi i)  exp^[0.5](x).Hmmm can it be 2*pi*i periodic? Like exp? If the cut lines are drawn to the right from the logarithmic singularity at 0.36237+/pi i, then exp^{0.5}(z) is 2pi i periodic. In this plot, the singularity at L,L* is drawn vertically, away from the real axis, but it is so slight that it is still not really visible, even where it intersects the pi i cut lines. This graph goes from +/10 real, +/10 imag, with grid lines every 5 units.
 Sheldon

« Next Oldest  Next Newest »
