2 real fixpoints again .......
#11
(01/19/2016, 01:55 PM)sheldonison Wrote:
tommy1729 Wrote:Yes , but the Superattracting fixpoint was just picked to make the example easy.
The actual goal is to get helpers for a pair of fixed points that are not superattractive.

(01/19/2016, 01:24 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: The Böttcher function does not really help much.
....
His work seems not to help with matters like radius of convergeance , area of agreement with functional equation , agreement on fixpoints etc etc.
....
It seems the super-attracting case is not essential to the discussion. For an attracting and a repelling fixed point, both fixed points have their own Schroeder function solutions, which don't agree with each other except in special cases (see http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...-iteration for details).

The biggest obstacle, is that there is no unique Abel/super function solution. For example, tetration b=sqrt(2) is no longer real valued, when viewed as a complex plane extension of tetration for real valued bases greater than exp(1/e). So tetration gives us two additional solutions to b=sqrt(2), which are complex conjugates of each other, depending on whether you rotate clockwise or counter-clockwise around the singularity at eta=exp(1/e). The result of this "tetration" theta mapping, is that the upper half of the complex plane looks like one of the fixed points, and the lower half of the complex plane looks like the other fixed point. There are an infinite number of other possible theta mappings of the two Abel or super-functions; some of them behave in other cool/interesting ways; but none of them seems particularly unique. There is also Gottfried's AIS sum solution. But there is no uniqueness, except when both fixed points are repelling, and then Henryk Trappmann's uniqueness proof is valid.

About your first link.

When i take z = 2 , i get a different result !?

I use the velocity addition from relativity

Tanh(2 arctan©) = ( a + b) / (1 + ab).
Since a = b = c we get = 2c / (1+ c^2).
This does not agree with your result ???

( and neither for tan addition ?! )
---

Also how about results different from moebius ?

Regards

Tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Range of complex tetration as real Daniel 2 391 10/22/2022, 08:08 PM
Last Post: Shanghai46
  From complex to real tetration Daniel 3 422 10/21/2022, 07:55 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Cost of real tetration Daniel 1 354 09/30/2022, 04:41 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Real Multivalued/Parametrized Iteration Groups bo198214 11 1,182 09/10/2022, 11:56 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Constructive real tetration Daniel 1 355 09/01/2022, 05:41 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Real and complex tetration Daniel 1 431 08/17/2022, 01:56 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Complex to real tetration Daniel 1 350 08/14/2022, 04:18 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Constructing a real valued Fibonacci iteration--its relation to \(1/1+z\) JmsNxn 7 709 08/13/2022, 12:05 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Challenging the concept of real tetration Daniel 2 527 07/04/2022, 03:09 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  Complex to real tetration via Kneser Daniel 3 699 07/02/2022, 02:22 AM
Last Post: Daniel



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)