Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Fundamental Principles of Tetration
#11
I have thought about a method that is fixpoint independant.
Cant find it now , but it is here.

I apparantly have the 2sinh method wich is a coo solution , probably nowhere analytic.

And with sheldon i developped fake function theory.

Regards

Tommy1729
Reply
#12
(03/09/2016, 10:33 AM)Daniel Wrote: Let and be holomorphic functions, then the Bell polynomials can be constructed using Faa Di Bruno's formula.
Thanks for your useful help!. I updated the thread.
Hopefully more can be deducted from it.

(03/09/2016, 10:33 AM)Daniel Wrote: Let me know if you have any questions.
How did you arrived to combinatorics and bell polynomials in relation to tetration?
It was across the Taylor series, or another way?

(03/09/2016, 10:33 AM)Daniel Wrote:
(03/08/2016, 06:58 PM)marraco Wrote: Also, many equations in use of different areas of mathematics already use iterated logarithms. But to consider those tetration to negative exponents, is necessary to consider tetration a multivalued function, with multiple branches.

Yes, if logarithms are infinitely multivalued, then tetration must account for it also. All my work is based on setting arbitrary fixed points to . That allows me to consider the dynamics of the infinite branches, because each of the branches has a fixed point for . Setting the entropy to being low for the exponential map can be achieved by setting close to unity in . Then the dynamics of neighboring fixed points can be computed from a fixed point.

Oh. I meant another thing. Let's take this expression:



It can be written , but only for some values of x and a, because for , is not defined for all values of x.

but it would be possible if is defined as a "function" with 3 branches (5 counting both asymptotes), because slog would be defined for any real value.

[Image: lynxfBI.jpg?1]

When I said iterated logarithms, I just meant the same, but for negative tetration exponents. Those iterated logarithms are the most commonly found on applications of tetration. For example, here, you find the use of



aside of that, there is a different issue: exponentiation and logarithms also produces multiple or infinite values. For example, has infinite results, so the plot of should be a surface or a fractal. What we do make of that?

I speculate that all those infinite numbers should be taken as a single number with r dimensions (as complex numbers are pairs of numbers, or bidimensional numbers). Maybe tetration introduce numbers whose dimension is a real value.
But that's pure speculation. I started this thread about it.
I didn't even managed to define a space with real dimension, and that's necessary to define operations, and tetration over those numbers.
I have the result, but I do not yet know how to get it.
Reply
#13
I have been quite active lately.

This is another C^oo solution for tetration ( super in base e ).

- again the question " analytic ? " -

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...p?tid=1028

Also a related open question on MSE copied from here by my friend mick.

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...l-equation

---

The continuum sum / product got alot of attention here too.
In particular from mike3.

I wrote about parabolic fixpoints and its limit formula's.

In general 99% of limit questions are solved ( excluding matrices , analytic ? ).

See

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...hp?tid=951

Another thing that got popular is the " J - function "

This is not in main , but mentioned occasionally so , therefore

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...hp?tid=911

Basically , you can easily find the popular ideas

By looking at

1) open problems section
- incomplete for clarity !! -

2) sorting by votes , replies and views ... But take with a grain of salt , Some are a bit overrated and others underrated ... Its just a statistically logic idea to search like that. Title choices can bias and there are not many votes.

3) keywords in other threads.

You can search the tag " tetration " on MSE to find Some ideas from here.
My student mick , sheldon and gottfried are on MSE too and i dare to say they are a reference in combination with the tag tetration.

An open problem that i discussed with mick is

http://math.stackexchange.com/questions/...-a-n-a-n-1

Myself , mick and sheldon imho tend to have as main keywords

Complex analysis , periodic and limit.

So i guess that is the style of us 3.

I already mentioned fake function theory and my 2sinh in a reply here in this thread.

I have a - very unfinished - google page.

In fact it needs attention.

https://sites.google.com/site/tommy1729/tetration

Im actually a number theorist.

https://sites.google.com/site/tommy1729/...conjecture

And i do not like set theory in Some ways ( ZFC ! ).

See

https://sites.google.com/site/tommy1729/...urable-set

And here

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...p?tid=1042

And

http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforu...hp?tid=695

Hope this helps.

My apologies for not posting Tex and plots or code alot.
I lack time Sad

Probably gives you An idea of the way i do things and think about them.

Regards

Tommy1729

Reply
#14
(03/13/2016, 04:13 AM)marraco Wrote:
(03/09/2016, 10:33 AM)Daniel Wrote: Let me know if you have any questions.
How did you arrived to combinatorics and bell polynomials in relation to tetration?
It was across the Taylor series, or another way?

See combinatorics for the story of how I discovered the combinatorial nature of tetration.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 6,184 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)