Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height
(01/14/2017, 12:36 AM)JmsNxn Wrote: Secondly, do you have any thoughts on how to show convergence. This seems to be the only thing blocking the path.

Unfortunately, I do not yet have a proof of convergence. But the intuition that lead me to this series is as follows. The difference between a tetration value of a finite integer height  and its limiting value (fixpoint)  decays exponentially, where the base of the exponent (I named it q, but it is commonly denoted by λ) is the logarithm of the limiting value. Now we want to find an expression for tetration  of a complex height z. Exponential decay is not approximated well by polynomials, so we need to switch from z to a new variable . After this, the values of the discrete tetration all lie almost on a straight line. It seemed plausible that they could be interpolated by Lagrange interpolating polynomials without causing Runge's phenomenon (erratic oscillations between sample points). Because with the new variable w sample points are not equally spaced, but rather form a geometric progression, the products in numerators and denominators of terms in the Lagrange interpolating polynomial turn into q-Pochhammer symbols and then can be combined into q-binomial coefficients (so that's the moment when q comes into play). The series I proposed is just the limit of the Lagrange interpolating polynomial when number of sample points tends to infinity, and its partial sums are the Lagrange interpolating polynomials built on a finite number of points. By construction, the series converges and exactly reproduces sample values at integer points. Convergence at non-integer points (that I can confirm numerically, but cannot prove) is basically equivalent to not having Runge's phenomenon during polynomial interpolation. Obeying the functional equation for tetration at all points, including non-integer, does not immediately follow from the construction, but was initially just a nice conjecture supported by numerical computations.

Messages In This Thread
RE: An explicit series for the tetration of a complex height - by Vladimir Reshetnikov - 01/14/2017, 02:13 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Perhaps a new series for log^0.5(x) Gottfried 3 900 03/21/2020, 08:28 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 3,315 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
Question Taylor series of i[x] Xorter 12 13,816 02/20/2018, 09:55 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Complaining about MSE ; attitude against tetration and iteration series ! tommy1729 0 1,891 12/26/2016, 03:01 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 14,920 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Tetration series for integer exponent. Can you find the pattern? marraco 20 19,242 02/21/2016, 03:27 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Explicit formula for the tetration to base [tex]e^{1/e}[/tex]? mike3 1 3,376 02/13/2015, 02:26 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Negative, Fractional, and Complex Hyperoperations KingDevyn 2 7,002 05/30/2014, 08:19 AM
Last Post: MphLee
  [integral] How to integrate a fourier series ? tommy1729 1 2,869 05/04/2014, 03:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  new results from complex dynamics bo198214 25 37,884 02/25/2013, 01:42 AM
Last Post: sheldonison

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)