Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Inverse super-composition
#10
(12/25/2016, 10:23 PM)Xorter Wrote:
(12/25/2016, 08:35 PM)sheldonison Wrote: For a fixed point of zero, with a fixed point multiplier of 2, the general solution for the Abel function generated at the fixed point of zero is:


This is the Abel function for f(z)

where S(z) is the formal Schröder equation solution;

This is sometimes called Koenig's solution. It can be modified to work with any fixed point multiplier of k, |k|<>1. Using pari-gp one can easily write a program to generate the formal power series for S(x) given f(x).

I almost undestand it.
Okey, than what is the a[n] and b[n] in the sum formula?
I feel we are closer then ever before.
Could you show me this way with another example, please?
For instance, let us invastigate it: . (And cos' fixed point is ~0.739.) The question is that what N is and how I can calculate it.




I make no attempt to address your question, partly because I doubt your question has an answer.

Using f(x) as an example to explore the Schröder equation probably isn't a good first example either because the multiplier at the fixed point, which is the a1 coefficient of f(x), is negative. Therefore it is no longer possible for the fractional iterates of the function to be real valued. So the Taylor series of the Schröder equation for f(x) isn't relevant either, but it follows the definition from my previous post. Here are the first couple of terms.
- Sheldon
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 11/24/2016, 12:53 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by JmsNxn - 11/25/2016, 08:55 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 12/23/2016, 01:33 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by JmsNxn - 12/23/2016, 08:12 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 12/24/2016, 09:53 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by sheldonison - 12/25/2016, 04:16 AM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 12/25/2016, 04:38 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by sheldonison - 12/25/2016, 08:35 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 12/25/2016, 10:23 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by sheldonison - 12/26/2016, 07:10 AM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 01/12/2017, 04:19 PM
RE: Inverse super-composition - by Xorter - 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 2,679 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 6,899 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 3,271 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Inverse Iteration Xorter 3 2,450 02/05/2019, 09:58 AM
Last Post: MrFrety
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 3,940 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 5,899 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Uniterated composition Xorter 2 3,169 09/15/2016, 05:17 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 1,907 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 2,589 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 10,869 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)