Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
tommy beta method
#1
Consider the following (double) integral where h is a positive infinitesimal



This integral is intended as an analogue for erf(s) but which is suppose to go - C for Re(s) << -1 and + C for Re(s) >> 1 ( independant of the imaginary part ! ).

Where C is a (probably nonzero and positive ) real constant.

Assuming that indeed 0 < C we continue :
 


Now consider 



And finally we get lim n to +oo ;



I call it tommy beta method , hence "tb"

This ofcourse requires more research.

regards

tommy1729

Tom Marcel Raes
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Tommy's Gaussian method. tommy1729 34 8,600 06/28/2022, 02:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  " tommy quaternion " tommy1729 25 7,590 06/25/2022, 10:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tommy's new conjecture/theorem/idea (2022) ?? tommy1729 0 54 06/22/2022, 11:49 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  The beta method thesis JmsNxn 9 1,087 04/20/2022, 05:32 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Trying to get Kneser from beta; the modular argument JmsNxn 2 440 03/29/2022, 06:34 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Calculating the residues of \(\beta\); Laurent series; and Mittag-Leffler JmsNxn 0 574 10/29/2021, 11:44 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The Generalized Gaussian Method (GGM) tommy1729 2 1,190 10/28/2021, 12:07 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Arguments for the beta method not being Kneser's method JmsNxn 54 14,734 10/23/2021, 03:13 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  tommy's singularity theorem and connection to kneser and gaussian method tommy1729 2 1,104 09/20/2021, 04:29 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Why the beta-method is non-zero in the upper half plane JmsNxn 0 712 09/01/2021, 01:57 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)