• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Jabotinsky's iterative logarithm Gottfried Ultimate Fellow Posts: 757 Threads: 116 Joined: Aug 2007 05/24/2008, 04:03 PM bo198214 Wrote:Perhaps we can agree on an external third person. Ecalle uses $w$ for what I would call "iteration exponent" or "iteration count". So $w$ would be mnemonic for "iteration width" haha. "width of notation"; so "ascii-width"... But then - the "width" of a powertower??? "recursion-depth" - "d" is not used much, but, well it's a mnemonic for derivative, so again... "r" for recursion-level? not used too much otherwise... Well, better to put this problem aside for another time, I think. Gottfried Helms, Kassel andydude Long Time Fellow Posts: 509 Threads: 44 Joined: Aug 2007 06/14/2008, 12:44 AM bo198214 Wrote:The categories (non-mathematical) are different: $\text{ilog}$ maps a function to a function (or better a formal powerseries to a formal powerseries) while the Abel function maps values to values. And before writing $\text{ilog}^{-1}$ you should assure that it is invertible, which stronly seems not to be the case. I realize why this is the case now. It would be like trying to reconstruct g(t) from g'(0). However, since: $\mathcal{A}[f](x) = \int \frac{dx}{\mathcal{J}[f](x)}$ and $f^{\circ t}(x) = \mathcal{A}[f]^{-1}(\mathcal{A}[f](x) + t)$ it could be argued that it should be possible to invert the iterative logarithm, provided the Abel function is invertible. Also, I've been starting to realize more and more, that this is really amazing! Jabotinsky was a master of iteration. In "Analytic Iteration" cited above, he gives this formula (3.10) in original and my notations: $L(F^{\circ s}(z)) = \frac{\partial}{\partial z}F^{\circ s}(z) \cd L(z) = \frac{\partial}{\partial s}F^{\circ s}(z)$ $\mathcal{J}[f](f^{\circ t}(x)) = \frac{\partial}{\partial x}f^{\circ t}(x) \cd \mathcal{J}[f](x) = \frac{\partial}{\partial t}f^{\circ t}(x)$ where the relationship between L and ilog are $L(x) = \mathcal{J}[f](x) = \text{ilog}(f)$. What I find most interesting about this formula is that right after it, Jabotinsky says: Jabotinsky Wrote:This double equation is fundamental in the theory of iteration. It can be used and extended in many ways.what did he mean by this? Obviously, he knew how important this was, but from reading it, it seems that he did not realize its connection to Abel functions. Does Ecalle mention the relationship to Julia functions or Abel functions? Andrew Robbins « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 1,080 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM Last Post: Ember Edison Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 1,555 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM Last Post: Ember Edison True or False Logarithm bo198214 4 8,795 04/25/2012, 09:37 PM Last Post: andydude Base 'Enigma' iterative exponential, tetrational and pentational Cherrina_Pixie 4 9,201 07/02/2011, 07:13 AM Last Post: bo198214 Principal Branch of the Super-logarithm andydude 7 13,171 06/20/2011, 09:32 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Logarithm reciprocal bo198214 10 19,690 08/11/2010, 02:35 AM Last Post: bo198214 Kneser's Super Logarithm bo198214 18 42,035 01/29/2010, 06:43 AM Last Post: mike3 Iterative square root like square root recursion limit bo198214 1 3,706 02/23/2009, 03:01 PM Last Post: Gottfried Unique Holomorphic Super Logarithm bo198214 3 5,451 11/24/2008, 06:23 AM Last Post: Kouznetsov Super-logarithm on the imaginary line andydude 3 5,477 11/15/2007, 05:52 PM Last Post: andydude

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)