• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Attempt to formally generalize log, exp functions to 3,4,5..(n,m) log exp JmsNxn Long Time Fellow Posts: 291 Threads: 67 Joined: Dec 2010 04/14/2011, 11:16 PM (This post was last modified: 04/14/2011, 11:16 PM by JmsNxn.) I think the easiest proof is $f(x^y) = f(x)f(y) = f(y^x)$ which can only be true for a constant function. bo198214 Administrator Posts: 1,389 Threads: 90 Joined: Aug 2007 04/15/2011, 07:29 AM (04/14/2011, 11:16 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: I think the easiest proof is $f(x^y) = f(x)f(y) = f(y^x)$ which can only be true for a constant function. But this would need a bit more explanation *why* constancy follows from that. And then its not that short anymore « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post The AB functions ! tommy1729 0 1,863 04/04/2017, 11:00 PM Last Post: tommy1729 the inverse ackerman functions JmsNxn 3 6,655 09/18/2016, 11:02 AM Last Post: Xorter Look-alike functions. tommy1729 1 2,374 03/08/2016, 07:10 PM Last Post: hixidom Inverse power tower functions tommy1729 0 2,142 01/04/2016, 12:03 PM Last Post: tommy1729 [2014] composition of 3 functions. tommy1729 0 2,029 08/25/2014, 12:08 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Intresting functions not ? tommy1729 4 5,834 03/05/2014, 06:49 PM Last Post: razrushil generalizing the problem of fractional analytic Ackermann functions JmsNxn 17 24,962 11/24/2011, 01:18 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Discrete-analytic functions Ansus 4 6,302 07/30/2011, 04:46 PM Last Post: tommy1729 product functions tommy1729 5 7,141 06/01/2011, 05:38 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Periodic functions that are periodic not by addition JmsNxn 0 2,997 04/17/2011, 09:54 PM Last Post: JmsNxn

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)