• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Taylor series of upx function sheldonison Long Time Fellow Posts: 641 Threads: 22 Joined: Oct 2008 12/03/2008, 09:11 PM Kouznetsov Wrote:Dear Zagreus. If you are still interested... I have expressed the holomorphic function which satisfies the equation you wrote through the Cauchi integral. It allows the straigihtforward differentiation. I claim that such a function is unique, if we insist that $\mathrm{upx}(z^*)= \mathrm{upx}(z)^*$ $\mathrm{upx'}(x)>0 \forall x>-2$ upx is holonorphic in the complex plane except real values smaller or equal 2. I have evaluated several coefficients in the Tailor expansion: $\mathrm{upx}(z)=\sum_{n=0}^\infty c_n z^n ~\forall z\in \mathbb{C}: |z|<2$ Here is the table of the coefficients $c_0, c_1,c_1,..$: .....Thank you for your table! About as far as I could go was to plug the taylor series coefficients into excel and show that the function and its first derivative match for several values for upx(x) and upx(x+1). What does this equation mean? $\mathrm{upx}(z^*)= \mathrm{upx}(z)^*$ I was expecting more along the lines of upx(x+1) = exp ( upx(x) ) The next line is also intriguing.... $\mathrm{upx'}(x)>0 \forall x>-2$ Does this mean that other holomorphic solutions exist, but they all must have a negative derivative at some point x>-2? I started working on the algebra to generate the general equations for all 5th and 6th order upx approximations that have smooth 1st, 2nd, and 3rd derivatives, but not necessarily smooth 4th and 5th derivatives. You would claim that all members of that set, if extended with higher order coefficients so that all derivatives would be smooth, would have a negative 1st derivative somewhere? Thanks again for your post! - Sheldon « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Taylor series of upx function - by Zagreus - 09/07/2008, 10:56 AM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by bo198214 - 09/10/2008, 01:56 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by andydude - 10/23/2008, 10:16 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by Kouznetsov - 11/16/2008, 01:40 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by bo198214 - 11/16/2008, 07:17 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by sheldonison - 11/17/2008, 12:21 AM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by Kouznetsov - 11/17/2008, 04:11 AM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by bo198214 - 11/18/2008, 11:49 AM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by sheldonison - 03/05/2009, 06:48 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by Kouznetsov - 12/02/2008, 12:03 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by sheldonison - 12/03/2008, 09:11 PM RE: Taylor series of upx function - by Kouznetsov - 12/05/2008, 12:30 AM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Perhaps a new series for log^0.5(x) Gottfried 3 678 03/21/2020, 08:28 AM Last Post: Daniel New mathematical object - hyperanalytic function arybnikov 4 1,034 01/02/2020, 01:38 AM Last Post: arybnikov Is there a function space for tetration? Chenjesu 0 661 06/23/2019, 08:24 PM Last Post: Chenjesu Degamma function Xorter 0 1,122 10/22/2018, 11:29 AM Last Post: Xorter Taylor series of i[x] Xorter 12 13,258 02/20/2018, 09:55 PM Last Post: Xorter Taylor series of cheta Xorter 13 14,329 08/28/2016, 08:52 PM Last Post: sheldonison Taylor polynomial. System of equations for the coefficients. marraco 17 18,088 08/23/2016, 11:25 AM Last Post: Gottfried Should tetration be a multivalued function? marraco 17 18,578 01/14/2016, 04:24 AM Last Post: marraco Introducing new special function : Lambert_t(z,r) tommy1729 2 3,998 01/10/2016, 06:14 PM Last Post: tommy1729 Tommy-Mandelbrot function tommy1729 0 2,175 04/21/2015, 01:02 PM Last Post: tommy1729

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)