Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Kneser's Super Logarithm
#3
So up to now we have a Schroeder function in a vicinity of the fixed point . This function satisfies:



The next thing Kneser does is to analytically continue from this small vicinity to the whole upper halfplane without the points , that is:
.
He first verifies that for each (where the cut of the logarithm is the usual one, i.e. .)

And then he continues the function along the increasing sets , which contain all the points such that is contained in that initial vicinity of .

The inverse function (in a vicinity of ) satisifies:
and hence can be continued to the whole complex plane, i.e. is an entire function.

To see the properties of on he considers the following lines and areas. Each increasing index number indicates the application of exponentiation, for example , . The lines are without end points, the areas are without boundaries.

   

These areas are mapped by to (the letters indicate the source area):

   

Now is simply connected and does not contain 0 (only in the boundary). Hence it is possible to define a holomorphic logarithm on that domain, he defines
on . Which then satisfies
.

And this is the image under , considering that is biholomorphic:
   

Define and define , then we have and . Define . So one can see that the boundary of consists only of the cyan and violet arcs, hence the points of the real axis in are mapped to the boundary of . This property is used in the final step of Kneser's construction, which follows in my next post.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Kneser's Super Logarithm - by bo198214 - 11/19/2008, 02:20 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by bo198214 - 11/19/2008, 03:25 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/23/2010, 01:01 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by mike3 - 01/25/2010, 06:35 AM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/25/2010, 07:42 AM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by mike3 - 01/26/2010, 06:24 AM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/26/2010, 01:22 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by mike3 - 01/27/2010, 06:28 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/27/2010, 08:30 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by mike3 - 01/28/2010, 08:52 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/28/2010, 10:08 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by mike3 - 01/29/2010, 06:43 AM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by bo198214 - 01/26/2010, 11:19 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by sheldonison - 01/27/2010, 07:51 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by bo198214 - 11/22/2008, 06:11 PM
RE: Kneser's Super Logarithm - by bo198214 - 11/23/2008, 01:00 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Arguments for the beta method not being Kneser's method JmsNxn 9 390 07/23/2021, 04:05 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Generalized Kneser superfunction trick (the iterated limit definition) MphLee 25 4,684 05/26/2021, 11:55 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Alternative manners of expressing Kneser JmsNxn 1 530 03/19/2021, 01:02 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Questions about Kneser... JmsNxn 2 730 02/16/2021, 12:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Kneser method question tommy1729 9 8,280 02/11/2020, 01:26 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 12,156 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition JmsNxn 4 11,056 06/23/2019, 08:19 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 12,969 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 22,652 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 7,953 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)