elementary superfunctions
#31
(04/25/2010, 10:48 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Challenge:
Is there an elementary superfunction of a polynomial that has no real fixed point?
I thnk so. How about transformation of line 5, \( b=2 \)?
Let \( H_0(z)=z^2 \) ; \( P(z)=z+1 \); \( Q(z)=z-1 \);
Let \( H_1(z)=P(H_0(Q(z)))=1+(z-1)^2 \);
Equation \( z=1+z^2-2z+1 \);
(BAD)is equivalent of equation \( z^2-z+2=0 \)
(BAD)Gives the fixed points \( z=1/2 \pm \sqrt{1/4-2}=1/2\pm i \sqrt{7/4} \)
Sorry I lost the signum! should be
is equivalent of equation \( z^2-3z+2=0 \)
Gives the fixed points \( z=1/2 \pm \sqrt{9/4-2}=1/2\pm \sqrt{1/4} \)
I try again:
\( P(z)=z+a \); \( Q(z)=z-a \);
Let \( H_1(z)=P(H_0(Q(z)))=a+(z-a)^2 \);
Equation \( z=a+z^2-2az+a^2 \);
is equivalent of equation \( z^2-(2a+1)z+a^2+a=0 \)
Gives the fixed points \( z=(2a+1)/2 \pm 1/2\sqrt{(4a^2+4a+1-4(a+a^2)} \)
\( z=(2a+1)/2 \pm 1/2\sqrt{1} \)
Henryk, it is not so easy... Sorry... but.. Wait... May I use complex \( a \) or the basefunction is supposed to be real? Do you mean "real polynomial"?
#32
(04/25/2010, 11:35 AM)Kouznetsov Wrote: How about transformation of line 5, \( b=2 \)?

I think this approach is going to fail.
Because then the superfunction is of the form \( \eta(e^{b^x}) \) which means that it is a regular superfunction at some fixed point with \( f'(z_0)=b \).
The only exception would be that we have a complex fixed point (of a real polynomial) with a real derivative \( b \), is that possible?

Quote:Henryk, it is not so easy... Sorry... but.. Wait... May I use complex \( a \) or the basefunction is supposed to be real? Do you mean "real polynomial"?

Yes real base and super function.
#33
(04/25/2010, 12:12 PM)bo198214 Wrote: .. \( \eta(e^{b^x}) \) ..is a regular superfunction at some fixed point with \( f'(z_0)=b \).
The only exception would be that we have a complex fixed point (of a real polynomial) with a real derivative \( b \), is that possible?
I do not understand the question. Is \( \eta \) allowed to be signular at the fixed point?

Quote:Yes real base and super function.
We could find numerically the superfunction for basefunction H(z)=1+z^2, describe the properties, and nominate it to the Mathematical Community as new element of the set of Special Functions.Wink
#34
(04/25/2010, 12:42 PM)Kouznetsov Wrote:
(04/25/2010, 12:12 PM)bo198214 Wrote: .. \( \eta(e^{b^x}) \) ..is a regular superfunction at some fixed point with \( f'(z_0)=b \).
The only exception would be that we have a complex fixed point (of a real polynomial) with a real derivative \( b \), is that possible?
I do not understand the question. Is \( \eta \) allowed to be signular at the fixed point?

\( \eta=P \).

Quote:We could find numerically the superfunction for basefunction H(z)=1+z^2, describe the properties, and nominate it to the Mathematical Community as new element of the set of Special Functions.Wink

Tongue
#35
(04/25/2010, 01:42 PM)Ansus Wrote:
Quote:Is there an elementary superfunction of a polynomial that has no real fixed point?

f(x)=x+1
F(x)=C+x

Haha, good hint to exclude the trivial case.
Btw. answers are not posted directly in the open problems thread. I explained that thoroughly in the beginning of that thread.
#36
(04/25/2010, 01:10 PM)bo198214 Wrote: ..
\( \eta=P \).
Ah, I understand. It can be singular, pulling out any property you like, from the exponential tail. \( e^{b^x} \) may approach its limiting value, and
\( P(e^{b^x}) \) may do that you like, at least until the closest cutline. While within the range of the holomorphism, you may deform and squeese the superfunction as you want with the transform indicated; it may be good for the application, or for the representation, or for the evaluation; no other deep meaning, that would allow or prohibit some particular properties. Roughly, you can convert ANY real holomorphic monotonic function to ANY other real holomorphic monotonic function, at least until to reach a singularity or a cutline.
#37
(04/25/2010, 10:53 AM)bo198214 Wrote: Is there an elementary real function \( F \), such that
\( F(1+F^{-1}(x)) \) is a real polynomial of degree at least 2 without real fixed points.

this question or similar has occured before.

some papers have been written about it , i considered similar questions and i believe it appeared on the math forum ...

ill have to dig ...

i believe hypergeometric solutions were found ...

but sometimes a hypergeo can be expressed by elementary functions ...

personally i considered inverse hypergeometric functions , but those also can be simplified sometimes.

so im optimistic ...

have you tried simple cases such as a*exp(b^x)*exp(c*x) + d ?
#38
(04/25/2010, 02:34 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: some papers have been written about it , i considered similar questions and i believe it appeared on the math forum ...

ill have to dig ...

i believe hypergeometric solutions were found ...

but sometimes a hypergeo can be expressed by elementary functions ...

personally i considered inverse hypergeometric functions , but those also can be simplified sometimes.

so im optimistic ...

Oh that would be great if you could recover some references!

Quote:have you tried simple cases such as a*exp(b^x)*exp(c*x) + d ?

I am still in the process of trying, however like always not much dedicatable time.
#39
(04/23/2009, 01:25 PM)bo198214 Wrote: But it does not exist at the other fixed point \( -\frac{1}{2} \), because \( \operatorname{arccosh}\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right) \) is not defined.
Arccosh(-1/2) = \( \tau \)*i/3
Please remember to stay hydrated.
ฅ(ミ⚈ ﻌ ⚈ミ)ฅ Sincerely: Catullus /ᐠ_ ꞈ _ᐟ\
#40
(06/15/2022, 11:30 PM)Catullus Wrote:
(04/23/2009, 01:25 PM)bo198214 Wrote: But it does not exist at the other fixed point \( -\frac{1}{2} \), because \( \operatorname{arccosh}\left(-\frac{1}{2}\right) \) is not defined.
Arccosh(-1/2) = \( \tau \) * i / 3

I think he meant defined on the reals.


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  tetration vs Tetration iterates vs tetration superfunctions.. preferred method? both? leon 0 270 10/10/2023, 01:33 PM
Last Post: leon
  fractals and superfunctions for f(x,y) ? tommy1729 4 1,663 09/16/2022, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [question] Local to global and superfunctions MphLee 8 2,719 07/17/2022, 06:46 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  New terminological standard for superfunctions. MphLee 12 8,978 05/19/2021, 02:54 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  I need somebody to help me clarifiy the elementary knowledge for tetration Ember Edison 13 24,176 08/26/2019, 01:44 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Between exp^[h] and elementary growth tommy1729 0 3,584 09/04/2017, 11:12 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Superfunctions in continu sum equations tommy1729 0 4,634 01/03/2013, 12:02 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  superfunctions of eta converge towards each other sheldonison 13 33,683 12/05/2012, 12:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  how many superfunctions? [was superfunctions of eta converge towards each other] tommy1729 8 21,123 05/31/2011, 07:38 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Elliptic Superfunctions BenStandeven 2 8,213 08/20/2010, 11:56 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)