Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation)
(08/05/2009, 08:16 AM)Kouznetsov Wrote: Super-logarithm and slog are very confusive terms. I suggest to use "arctetration" and "ate" instead.
Hear, hear! And may I suggest, while we're at it, that we do away with the term "logarithm" altogether. How are we supposed to remember that it's the inverse of exponentiation? Better to call it arcexponentiation, for consistency. Indeed, division and subtraction should likewise be arcmultiplication and arcaddition. Let's get all these confusing terms out of the mathematical glossary and be done with it!

On a sidenote, I've never really minded switching freely between the terms "tetration" and "super-exponentiation", yet for some reason the term "super-logarithm" (or simply "s-log" or "slog") seems stuck in my vocabulary, and the next closest term that comes to mind is "the inverse of the super-exponential function" or something similarly descriptive, but lacking brevity.

So "superlogarithm" it shall remain. You will have to pry it from my cold dead hands! Angry

Or try to come up with something a little more natural (pun intended) than arc-super-exponentiation or arc-tetration. Sorry, as a native english speaker and amateur mathemetician (because the professionals don't count Tongue ), the "arc"s just aren't cutting it. But maybe it will grow on me over time... I suppose part of the problem is that I've never really preferred the "arc-" prefixes for the trigonometric functions (much less for non-trigonometric functions!), even though they have their benefits when, e.g., the notation is ambiguous (multiplicative or functional inverse?).

Then again, what does the "arc" really mean? In the context of trigonometry, which was founded on the study of actual "arcs" among other things, I never really put much thought into it. Oddly, wikipedia and several online dictionaries fail to make any etymological note whatsoever on the use of "arc".
~ Jay Daniel Fox

Messages In This Thread
RE: overview paper co-author invitation - by jaydfox - 08/05/2009, 05:51 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Sat March 6th second Tetration mtg; Peter Walker's 1991 paper sheldonison 13 4,750 03/07/2021, 08:30 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The second iteration of my most recent paper JmsNxn 3 1,537 02/07/2021, 11:11 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Are there any reputable sources verifying terminology? Chenjesu 0 2,579 08/09/2018, 08:20 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Old Research Paper andydude 3 7,040 01/24/2018, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Poll: revised super terminology poll Base-Acid Tetration 8 16,537 08/23/2009, 12:26 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Poll: hyper-operations terminology Base-Acid Tetration 3 8,954 08/22/2009, 05:08 PM
Last Post: Base-Acid Tetration
  overview paper co-author invitation bo198214 20 49,757 08/12/2009, 07:00 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  fractional powers of function inversion (was: changing terminology) Base-Acid Tetration 5 13,404 08/11/2009, 01:26 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Paper with iteration intro andydude 4 11,255 05/13/2009, 07:53 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Hyper terminology andydude 1 5,623 09/17/2008, 02:23 PM
Last Post: bo198214

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)