Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation)
#46
What you are talking about only makes sense with a descriptive definition, a definition that attempts to capture current usage and the like. What I think we were doing was making a stipulative definition, one that we hold true no matter what.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: changing terminology (was: overview paper co-author invitation) - by andydude - 08/23/2009, 12:46 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Are there any reputable sources verifying terminology? Chenjesu 0 764 08/09/2018, 08:20 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Old Research Paper andydude 3 2,695 01/24/2018, 04:12 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Poll: revised super terminology poll Base-Acid Tetration 8 8,889 08/23/2009, 12:26 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Poll: hyper-operations terminology Base-Acid Tetration 3 5,172 08/22/2009, 05:08 PM
Last Post: Base-Acid Tetration
  overview paper co-author invitation bo198214 20 27,555 08/12/2009, 07:00 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  fractional powers of function inversion (was: changing terminology) Base-Acid Tetration 5 7,715 08/11/2009, 01:26 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  Paper with iteration intro andydude 4 6,037 05/13/2009, 07:53 AM
Last Post: andydude
  Hyper terminology andydude 1 3,158 09/17/2008, 02:23 PM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)