Login

andydude · (This post was last modified: 08/24/2009, 01:40 AM by andydude.)

Looking around the forum, I can't find good references for these, although there are lots of references to these formulas, I think it would be good to have these together, so here they are:

$ \begin{tabular}{rl} \frac{\partial}{\partial a} ({}^{x}{a}) & = \frac{1}{a} \sum_{k=1}^{x} \ln(a)^{k-1} \prod_{j=0}^{k} {}^{{(x-j)}}{a} \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} ({}^{x}{a}) & = T(a) \ln(a)^x \prod_{k=1}^{x} {}^{k}{a} \end{tabular} $
where
$T(a) = \left[\frac{\partial}{\partial x} ({}^{x}{a})\right]_{x=0}$

I also found a descent approximation to T(a):

$T(a) \approx \log_{2.55} \log_{2.55} (2.29 + 2.58 a)$

Andrew Robbins

***bo198214*** · (This post was last modified: 08/23/2009, 10:04 AM by bo198214.)

The I use this thread for giving the general formula for a superfunction $\sigma$ of $f$ :
$\sigma(x+1)=f(\sigma(x))$
$\sigma'(x+1)=f'(\sigma(x))\sigma'(x)$
$\sigma'(x+n) = \sigma'(x)\prod_{k=0}^{n-1} f'(\sigma(x+k))$

***bo198214*** · 08/23/2009, 10:14 AM

(08/23/2009, 01:12 AM)andydude Wrote: $ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} ({}^{x}{a}) = T(a) \ln(a)^x \prod_{k=0}^{x - 1} {}^{k}{a} $

Doesnt it need to read
$ \frac{\partial}{\partial x} ({}^{x}{a}) = T(a) \ln(a)^x \prod_{k=0}^{x - 1} {}^{k+1}{a} $
?

andydude · (This post was last modified: 08/24/2009, 05:39 AM by andydude.)

@Ansus
Thank you so much for finding that mistake! I fixed it in my original post.

Also, I noticed in the MathFacts page that it is a very complete overview, except for two things: the base-sqrt(2) tetration approximation: ${}^{x}{(\sqrt{2})} \approx 2 \frac{x+1}{x+2}$ , and intuitive/natural tetration, for which i would say that the matrix encoding of

$\alpha(b^x) = \alpha(x) + 1$

is

$(C[b^x]^T - I)D[\alpha] = D[1]$

which can be solved for $\alpha(x)$ "intuitively" despite the fact that $(C[b^x]^T - I)$ is a noninvertible matrix.

***bo198214*** · 08/25/2009, 09:49 AM

(08/24/2009, 05:37 AM)andydude Wrote: @Ansus
Thank you so much for finding that mistake! I fixed it in my original post.

Hey, I also discovered that mistake! Only my solution suggestion was different from Ansus'.
$Wink$

andydude · (This post was last modified: 09/03/2009, 07:55 AM by andydude.)

I really have to put my foot down on this one. The lower limit is is not zero as it appears in the Tetration_Summary page. It is 1. I have re-derived a more general formula for this that accentuates this lower index:
$ P(a, x_0, x_1) = \prod_{k=x_0}^{x_1} \text{sexp}_a(k) \ln(a) = \ln(a)^{(x_1 - x_0 + 1)}\prod_{k=x_0}^{x_1} \text{sexp}_a(k) = \frac{{\text{sexp}_a}'(x_1)}{{\text{sexp}_a}'(x_0 - 1)} $
as you can see from this, if the final derivative in the denominator is evaluated at ( $0 = x_0 - 1$ ), then this means $x_0 = 1$ , which means the lower index of the product is (k=1), not (k=0).

@Ansus
Your derivations are based on the (k=0) formula (which is wrong), but other than that, they are quite clever! I never thought to do that. I think there would be less room for error if we use the "P" function to simplify things. Starting with the basic derivatives:

${\text{sexp}_a}'(x) = {\text{sexp}_a}'{(x_0)} P(a, x_0 + 1, x)$
${\text{spow}_x}'(a) = \frac{1}{a \ln a} \sum_{k=1}^{x} P(a, x - k, x)$

combining them gives:

$\frac{{\text{spow}_x}'(a)}{{\text{sexp}_a}'(x)} = \frac{1}{a \ln a} \sum_{k=1}^{x} \frac{1}{{\text{sexp}_a}'(x - k - 1)}$

which is about as rigorous as I can make it, so that should be right.

Andrew Robbins

andydude · (This post was last modified: 09/03/2009, 01:33 AM by andydude.)

(09/02/2009, 10:09 AM)Ansus Wrote: Note that this formula ... works both with lower limit 0 and 1 because $f_a(0)=1$ .

True, but it does have unfortunate misunderstandings later on, like the extra $\ln(a)^2$ in the final formula, which is incorrect. Using index substitution, the right formula is:

$\frac{{\text{spow}_x}'(a)}{{\text{sexp}_a}'(x)} = \frac{1}{a \ln a} \sum_{k=0}^{x-1} \frac{1}{{\text{sexp}_a}'(k - 1)}$

Our formulas are identical except for the $\ln(a)^2$ , which should be $\ln(a)$ . This extra logarithm comes from the wrong index.

andydude · (This post was last modified: 09/03/2009, 07:58 AM by andydude.)

(09/03/2009, 01:51 AM)Ansus Wrote: Only because it gives extra ln(a)?

Yes, but wait. I'm wrong now. It is $\ln(a)^2$ in the denominator... I'm sorry. You're right. All of this off-by-one stuff is hard to keep track of.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Nixon-Banach-Lambert-Raes tetration is analytic , simple and “ closed form “ !!	tommy1729	11	3,865	02/04/2021, 03:47 AM Last Post: JmsNxn
	Isomorphism of newtonian calculus rules for Non-Newtonian (anti)derivatives of hypers	Micah	4	5,617	03/02/2019, 08:23 PM Last Post: Micah
	1st iterated derivatives and the tetration of 0	Xorter	0	2,838	05/12/2018, 12:34 PM Last Post: Xorter
	Regular iteration using matrix-Jordan-form	Gottfried	7	14,162	09/29/2014, 11:39 PM Last Post: Gottfried
	On the binary partition and taking derivatives	tommy1729	0	2,940	09/29/2014, 11:34 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	Wonderful new form of infinite series; easy solve tetration	JmsNxn	1	6,669	09/06/2012, 02:01 AM Last Post: JmsNxn
	"circular" operators, "circular" derivatives, and "circular" tetration.	JmsNxn	2	9,467	06/24/2011, 07:21 PM Last Post: JmsNxn
	closed form for regular superfunction expressed as a periodic function	sheldonison	31	51,996	09/09/2010, 10:18 PM Last Post: tommy1729
	Divergent Sums in Polar form of odd/even term Formal Powerseries	Ivars	0	4,082	06/21/2008, 02:24 PM Last Post: Ivars
	q concerning derivatives	Gottfried	0	3,711	03/19/2008, 08:28 AM Last Post: Gottfried