• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e Gottfried Ultimate Fellow Posts: 765 Threads: 119 Joined: Aug 2007 09/13/2009, 06:14 AM (09/12/2009, 09:04 PM)mike3 Wrote: So then since neither of those worked, it seems all we're left with is the Ansus formula and the Cauchy integral (but determining the correct contours and asymptotic behavior, now that's the rub...). I'm also curious: What about $b = e^{-e}$ exactly? You said it converges slowly, but how do you iterate it at all? What is the asymptotic as the tower $x \rightarrow \infty$? I used a complex fixpoint and could generate the matrices for regular iteration (in context of diagonalization). The fixpoint I used is t0 = -0.1957457524880764 - 1.691199920910569*I one of its logarithms is u0 = 0.5320921219863799 + 4.597158013302573*I where u0 = log(t0) + 2*Pi*I // log giving the principal branch With this I create the triangular Bell-matrix and diagonalize. The series has complex terms and is very difficult to evaluate - I accelerate slow converging series usually with Euler-summation, but the series has complex terms and it seems I need also complex order for Euler-summation. With 128 terms I could at least get results which reproduced the integer iteration to such an approximate that I'm confident that the series can be used in principle. However, the fractional iterates behave even worse, and two half-iterates reproduce the integer iterate just to two decimals... The schröder-term s for schr(x') and x'=x/t0 - 1 at x=1 is, according to the last three partial sums of the series (128 terms): Code:[126]  -0.4119542792176348+1.439754774257274*I [127]  -0.4119542792176264+1.439754774257268*I [128]  -0.4119542792176181+1.439754774257268*I ...where I assume s~ -0.411954279217... +1.439754774257...*I as correct decimals. From here we can compute y' = schr°-1(s * u0^h ) and with h=1 I reproduce exp_b°1(1) = b =exp(-exp(1)) to 15 digits exact. The last three partial sums of the series: Code:´ [126]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I [127]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I [128]   -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I ...From here y' = -1.004456441437337+0.03850266639539727*I, y=(y'+1)*t0 , y-b = -7.405812 E-17 + 2.57894 E-15*I is an acceptable approximation. However - it is only the integer-iteration. I've not yet found en Euler-order or another convergence acceleration which stabilizes the partial sums for the half-iterate to an acceptable degree. Gottfried Gottfried Helms, Kassel « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/12/2009, 02:00 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/12/2009, 06:56 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/12/2009, 07:20 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/12/2009, 07:40 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/12/2009, 07:47 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/12/2009, 08:07 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/12/2009, 08:35 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/12/2009, 08:50 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/12/2009, 03:48 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/12/2009, 09:04 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 06:14 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/13/2009, 07:24 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 09:57 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/13/2009, 11:23 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 11:44 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/14/2009, 09:43 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/17/2009, 08:01 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/17/2009, 11:03 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 01:34 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/13/2009, 07:34 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by Gottfried - 09/14/2009, 02:02 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/13/2009, 08:08 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by mike3 - 09/13/2009, 09:49 AM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by tommy1729 - 09/18/2009, 12:16 PM RE: Solving tetration for base 0 < b < e^-e - by bo198214 - 09/18/2009, 01:00 PM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 2,986 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM Last Post: sheldonison Is bounded tetration is analytic in the base argument? JmsNxn 0 1,558 01/02/2017, 06:38 AM Last Post: JmsNxn Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 2,123 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM Last Post: JmsNxn tetration base sqrt(e) tommy1729 2 3,668 02/14/2015, 12:36 AM Last Post: tommy1729 Explicit formula for the tetration to base $$e^{1/e}$$? mike3 1 3,270 02/13/2015, 02:26 PM Last Post: Gottfried tetration base > exp(2/5) tommy1729 2 3,439 02/11/2015, 12:29 AM Last Post: tommy1729 regular tetration base sqrt(2) : an interesting(?) constant 2.76432104 Gottfried 7 10,103 06/25/2013, 01:37 PM Last Post: sheldonison tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 60,175 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM Last Post: sheldonison simple base conversion formula for tetration JmsNxn 0 3,485 09/22/2011, 07:41 PM Last Post: JmsNxn Does anyone have taylor series approximations for tetration and slog base e^(1/e)? JmsNxn 18 22,868 06/05/2011, 08:47 PM Last Post: sheldonison

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)