09/20/2007, 10:37 AM

Hi, Andrew!

Thank you for your clear and systematic comments. Indeed, my suggestins concerning points 2 and 5 (partial box notation and symbolic representation of the super-root) was strongly ... inspired by MathType. Their available logotypes are extremely clear.

Unfortunately, I am still ... swimming with a lot of problems in TeX, which at the moment sems to be indispensable for publications. But, I understand your concern. Let me think about. I am a little bit ... sloooow, but ... reliable. For level s=4 (tetra) we need immediately understandable logotypes, just for avoiding long and painful interpretations.

Thank you also for your "Tetration in Context".

G. F. Romerio (Gianfranco)

Thank you for your clear and systematic comments. Indeed, my suggestins concerning points 2 and 5 (partial box notation and symbolic representation of the super-root) was strongly ... inspired by MathType. Their available logotypes are extremely clear.

Unfortunately, I am still ... swimming with a lot of problems in TeX, which at the moment sems to be indispensable for publications. But, I understand your concern. Let me think about. I am a little bit ... sloooow, but ... reliable. For level s=4 (tetra) we need immediately understandable logotypes, just for avoiding long and painful interpretations.

Thank you also for your "Tetration in Context".

G. F. Romerio (Gianfranco)