Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Another proof of TPID 6
#1
(10/07/2009, 12:03 AM)andydude Wrote: Conjecture

where such that

Discussion

To evaluate f at real numbers, an extension of tetration is required, but to evaluate f at positive integers, only real-valued exponentiation is needed. Thus the sequence given by the solutions of the equations




and so on... is the sequence under discussion. The conjecture is that the limit of this sequence is , also known as eta (). Numerical evidence indicates that this is true, as the solution for x in is approximately 1.44.

lim n-> oo x^^n = n conj : any real x = eta

since (eta+q) ^^ n grows faster than n for any positive q , we can use the squeeze theorem

lim q -> 0 eta =< x <= eta + q

hence x = eta

see also http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Squeeze_theorem

QED

regards

tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  RED ALERT : TPID CONJECTURES GONE ??? tommy1729 4 71 08/12/2022, 10:08 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
Question TPID 6 Catullus 1 132 07/04/2022, 12:55 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  TPID 4 tommy1729 30 52,982 06/18/2022, 10:40 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 4,979 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 3,668 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Flexible etas and eulers ? TPID 10 tommy1729 0 3,188 08/19/2016, 12:09 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  (almost) proof of TPID 13 fivexthethird 1 5,317 05/06/2016, 04:12 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  introducing TPID 16 tommy1729 4 10,233 06/18/2014, 11:46 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  TPID 8 tommy1729 0 3,672 04/04/2011, 10:45 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Discussion of TPID 6 JJacquelin 3 10,900 10/24/2010, 07:44 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)