• 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
• 1
• 2
• 3
• 4
• 5
 Our tetration concept is a wrong way? Ansus Junior Fellow Posts: 20 Threads: 5 Joined: Aug 2008 11/06/2010, 04:57 AM (11/06/2010, 01:30 AM)mike3 Wrote: Well this approach looks to be of no use. Note that $f_a(f_a^{-1}(x) + \frac{1}{h})$ is $\frac{1}{h}$ iterate of the "subfunction" of $f_a$, which is uniquely given by $f_a(f_a^{-1}(x) + 1)$. Thus h iterates of it yields that subfunction, regardless of the specific superfunction used (i.e. a 1-cyclic transform of it will give the same subfunction, hence the same "iterative derivative".). Essentially, there is apparently no difference between this and the "discrete iterative derivative". Yes. I have noticed that. What about using the x instead of 1 as in the current post? « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

 Messages In This Thread Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by Ansus - 11/06/2010, 12:08 AM RE: Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by mike3 - 11/06/2010, 01:30 AM RE: Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by Ansus - 11/06/2010, 04:57 AM RE: Our tetration concept is a wrong way? - by mike3 - 11/06/2010, 06:37 AM

 Possibly Related Threads... Thread Author Replies Views Last Post What am I doing wrong here? JmsNxn 2 5,978 05/26/2011, 02:21 AM Last Post: JmsNxn

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)