Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaginary zeros of f(z)= z^(1/z) (real valued solutions f(z)>e^(1/e))
Ivars Wrote:You can not see what I can not express properlySmile


ln sqrt2=1/2 ln 2

when k=1 -> 4 values

ln sqrt2 = 1/2 ln 2 +- 2pi I -> 2 values, but + 2pi *I and - 2pi*I is the same
ln -sqrt2 = 1/2 ln2 + - pi*I -> 2 values and +pi and - pi which does not coincide with any other values

I have a feeling that tetration is the field where reducing this ambiquity early on and reaching definitions of tetration via convergent series or functions ( like W(z) ) looses important information on the way.

When You see e^i*pi/2 You think about rotation of 90 degrees. When i = h(e^pi/2) then e^h(e^pi/2) * pi/2 is also a rotation by 90 degress but involves infinite operation on real numbers. NO i. It is an identity- You can replace i with h(z) and -i with another branch of h(z) . And depending on the sign of h(z) it will be either rotation anticlockwise, or clockwise.

so h(e^pi/2)^2 = -1 but we clearly know that each h(e^pi/2) which is root of -1 is found via different branch, so they can not be replacable so easily .

May be I am terribly wrong, as I really can not nail the place where it really matters.
Hmm, surely there are more possibilities to express a value not only by convergent, but also by divergent series. May be your idea was already covered with my observation, that seemingly the same matrix Bs containing the needed coefficients for tetration can be seen as compsed of different versions of eigen-matrices
Bs = W0 * D0 * W0^-1
= W1 * D1 * W1^-1
where W0, W1, etc are constructed by different powerseries based on the multitude of different fixpoints. So the different solutions you talk about are possibly reflected in the different versions of the eigenmatrices?

I'll read your post again later and try myself to eliminate further misunderstandings, if there is still one.

Gottfried Helms, Kassel

Messages In This Thread
RE: Imaginary zeros of f(z)= z^(1/z) (real valued solutions f(z)>e^(1/e)) - by Gottfried - 11/14/2007, 02:49 PM
RE: Tetration below 1 - by Gottfried - 09/09/2007, 07:04 AM
RE: The Complex Lambert-W - by Gottfried - 09/09/2007, 04:54 PM
RE: The Complex Lambert-W - by andydude - 09/10/2007, 06:58 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Constructing real tetration solutions Daniel 4 3,883 12/24/2019, 12:10 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 3,880 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 14,915 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. marraco 7 13,784 03/19/2015, 10:45 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 32,146 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  About real limits tommy1729 1 3,653 09/23/2013, 09:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Solutions to f ' (x) = f(f(x)) ? tommy1729 1 3,587 08/12/2013, 12:10 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function) bo198214 39 70,528 08/13/2011, 06:33 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  The imaginary tetration unit? ssroot of -1 JmsNxn 2 7,317 07/15/2011, 05:12 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Tetration and imaginary numbers. robo37 2 7,402 07/13/2011, 03:25 PM
Last Post: robo37

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)