Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 3 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Imaginary zeros of f(z)= z^(1/z) (real valued solutions f(z)>e^(1/e))
#62
Ivars Wrote:
Gottfried Wrote:Well in this case, for the result s being real only, alpha is a unique function of beta. If you take +beta you need one alpha, and if you take -beta, you need another alpha adapted from this; in this case, the two alphas are even equal (the graph looks symmetrical w.r.t. y-axis).
So no ambiguity is here, just use the formula of my paper, by which the alpha is determined by beta to get a real s.

Gottfried

I do not take +- beta, I take +- I . beta is still 0<beta<pi.

But that is funny. What else is u = alpha + beta*I , so to have some U with imaginary part 1*I or -1*I, you use beta = 1 or beta = -1 .
And then see, what value the real part must have such that the resulting s is purely real.
And while the graph shows only u = alpha -pi*I .. u=alpha + pi*I there is no problem to extend the graph to u = alpha + (beta + 2*k*pi)*I - there is a rough periodicity with a distortion then. Just plot it in other ranges.

Quote:In that case, IMAG(t) at beta=pi/2 would be -I, so graph will be on the right lower quadrant. However, at beta - pi/2, if we take +i, we get IMAG(t) = -i -> in the left lower quadrant, while at -I it will be where it is now-left upper quadrant.

The question is, can we even use beta = - pi/2 as that would imply

Yes, just look in the 3'rd quadrant; the required value for alpha is on the blue curve, and the resulting values for real and imag of t are on the magenta curves, and the resulting value for s is on the green curve.

Quote:h(e^-pi/2) diverges which it does not, and s in that case is not 4,81 = e^pi/2......... but 0,20........=i^i.

??? hmmm....
Regards -

Gottfried
Gottfried Helms, Kassel
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Imaginary zeros of f(z)= z^(1/z) (real valued solutions f(z)>e^(1/e)) - by Gottfried - 11/16/2007, 09:09 AM
RE: Tetration below 1 - by Gottfried - 09/09/2007, 07:04 AM
RE: The Complex Lambert-W - by Gottfried - 09/09/2007, 04:54 PM
RE: The Complex Lambert-W - by andydude - 09/10/2007, 06:58 AM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  b^b^x with base 0<b<e^-e have three real fixpoints Gottfried 1 2,124 11/07/2017, 11:06 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  2 real fixpoints again ....... tommy1729 10 8,450 02/23/2016, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  A new set of numbers is necessary to extend tetration to real exponents. marraco 7 8,671 03/19/2015, 10:45 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Real-analytic tetration uniqueness criterion? mike3 25 19,872 06/15/2014, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  About real limits tommy1729 1 2,280 09/23/2013, 09:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Solutions to f ' (x) = f(f(x)) ? tommy1729 1 2,185 08/12/2013, 12:10 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Real and complex behaviour of the base change function (was: The "cheta" function) bo198214 39 49,022 08/13/2011, 06:33 PM
Last Post: bo198214
  The imaginary tetration unit? ssroot of -1 JmsNxn 2 5,191 07/15/2011, 05:12 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Tetration and imaginary numbers. robo37 2 5,170 07/13/2011, 03:25 PM
Last Post: robo37
  Infinite tetration of the imaginary unit GFR 40 52,005 06/26/2011, 08:06 AM
Last Post: bo198214



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)