Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A question about the asymptotes of tetration
#1
I hate to be a noob, but am I allowed to conclude that since that tetration has poles at all negative integers excluding -1?

I think I am, but some part of me is hesitant, I'm wondering if some people argue that the log law breaks down after zero. (Though I think that would be pretty stupid.)
Reply
#2
you meant log singularities instead of poles ? i hope Smile

what do you mean by " break down ".

sounds like a shrink term rather than math to me Smile

then again , tetration can drive you crazy.
Reply
#3
(04/17/2011, 05:49 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: what do you mean by " break down ".

Yeah, I thought that sounded kind of dumb.

And yes I meant log singularities.
Reply
#4
(04/17/2011, 05:06 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: I hate to be a noob, but am I allowed to conclude that since that tetration has poles at all negative integers excluding -1?

I think I am, but some part of me is hesitant, I'm wondering if some people argue that the log law breaks down after zero. (Though I think that would be pretty stupid.)

You would be right in concluding there are singularities, but they're not poles -- they are singularities, i.e. the first is a logarithmic singularity, the second is a "double-logarithmic" singularity, and so on. In the complex numbers, is a "multi-valued function" (this term should really be something like multi-valued relation, but this misnomer is so ingrained in tradition it's not funny), like itself.
Reply
#5
(04/17/2011, 07:25 PM)mike3 Wrote:
(04/17/2011, 05:06 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: I hate to be a noob, but am I allowed to conclude that since that tetration has poles at all negative integers excluding -1?

I think I am, but some part of me is hesitant, I'm wondering if some people argue that the log law breaks down after zero. (Though I think that would be pretty stupid.)

You would be right in concluding there are singularities, but they're not poles -- they are singularities, i.e. the first is a logarithmic singularity, the second is a "double-logarithmic" singularity, and so on. In the complex numbers, is a "multi-valued function" (this term should really be something like multi-valued relation, but this misnomer is so ingrained in tradition it's not funny), like itself.

Okay, alright I'll make sure to not call them poles. Tongue
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Math.Stackexchange.com question on extending tetration Daniel 3 1,533 03/31/2021, 12:28 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Kneser method question tommy1729 9 10,283 02/11/2020, 01:26 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  A Notation Question (raising the highest value in pow-tower to a different power) Micah 8 11,452 02/18/2019, 10:34 PM
Last Post: Micah
  Math overflow question on fractional exponential iterations sheldonison 4 9,450 04/01/2018, 03:09 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Sexp redefined ? Exp^[a]( - 00 ). + question ( TPID 19 ??) tommy1729 0 3,345 09/06/2016, 04:23 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  [MO] Is there a tetration for infinite cardinalities? (Question in MO) Gottfried 10 21,386 12/28/2014, 10:22 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Another question! JmsNxn 4 8,147 08/27/2013, 06:57 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Very curious question JmsNxn 3 7,067 08/20/2013, 08:56 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Question about curvature tommy1729 0 3,041 12/15/2012, 11:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  (MSE) A limit- question concerning base-change Gottfried 0 3,981 10/03/2012, 06:44 PM
Last Post: Gottfried



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)