Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#21
describes the function your assumption produces, i.e.:




and so on, while still allowing and retaining the property .

By the term orbit I'm refering to a term from dynamical systems where, given a point x, the sequence {x, f(x), f(f(x)), ...} is referred to as the orbit of f from x which is a way of referring to iteration without referring to the t in . By using it this way, though, I'm slightly misusing it, since its a sequence, and not a function. Here I'm using it as a function , sorry if it was confusing. One of the reasons why I like the term 'orbit' so much is that it pairs nicely with iterate which, given t, is a function . I've discussed these terms here as well.

Andrew Robbins
Reply
#22
andydude Wrote: describes the function your assumption produces, i.e.:




and so on, while still allowing and retaining the property .

By the term orbit I'm refering to a term from dynamical systems where, given a point x, the sequence {x, f(x), f(f(x)), ...} is referred to as the orbit of f from x which is a way of referring to iteration without referring to the t in . By using it this way, though, I'm slightly misusing it, since its a sequence, and not a function. Here I'm using it as a function , sorry if it was confusing. One of the reasons why I like the term 'orbit' so much is that it pairs nicely with iterate which, given t, is a function . I've discussed these terms here as well.

Andrew Robbins

Ok, I see. Still a pathological function though. It cannot be made continuous at 1. If we define to conform with the limit of the tetraroots towards zero, then from the functional equation of tetration we must have:

.

However, the limit from the left of y=1 can be found by using the following:



Solving the latter with Maple, one gets , so there is a discontinuity at y=1. In short, no matter how this function is defined at y=0 and y=1, it cannot be made continuous simultaneously at y=0 and y=1.

I prefer it defined as:





and let it do as it pleases in between, even if it ends up discontinuous.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  A first hires look at tetration \(\lambda = 1\) and \(b = e\) JmsNxn 25 1,553 11/29/2021, 12:15 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Has this tetration been considered before in the forum? MphLee 5 323 11/05/2021, 05:12 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  On the first derivative of the n-th tetration of f(x) Luknik 5 419 10/28/2021, 11:53 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  On the [tex]2 \pi i[/tex]-periodic solution to tetration, base e JmsNxn 0 232 09/28/2021, 05:44 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  I'm back on tetration forum sheldonison 6 920 09/25/2021, 04:13 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Using a family of asymptotic tetration functions... JmsNxn 15 4,107 08/06/2021, 01:47 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Galidakis & Extending tetration to non-integers Daniel 4 1,107 05/31/2021, 01:26 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Generalized Kneser superfunction trick (the iterated limit definition) MphLee 25 8,241 05/26/2021, 11:55 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  A Holomorphic Function Asymptotic to Tetration JmsNxn 2 1,145 03/24/2021, 09:58 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Compartmentalizing tetration proofs Daniel 1 833 03/23/2021, 12:52 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)