Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents
#7
bo198214 Wrote:Nobody denies that the tetraroot is the inverse of (by definition) however to define as being the tetraroot is quite arbitrary

Why? What is "arbitrary" about it? And if it's "arbitrary", in what "sense" is it "arbitrary"? Again, if the definition of the n-th order tetraroot as is "arbitrary", surely the tetraroot can be defined better as for some m,n. Do you care to define m and n in some other consistent way for the tetraroot?

bo198214 Wrote:and additionally does not coincide with our other methods.

So? Has a divine judge decided on the validity of any of the proposed methods so far?

bo198214 Wrote:Sorry Ioannis, but this rather proves that it is the wrong definition. As should be a function continuous in it must

Sorry, I am not convinced that should even *be* continuous (even whether it exists), despite the agreement between all the current methods. All the methods so far (including mine), exhibit a certain "artificiality" if you wish, which is apparent from the complexity which reveals itself when one asks a very simple question: HOW do you define the tetration function for RATIONAL values.

If you cannot tell me how the tetration function is defined at the rationals, then you *cannot* tell me how it's defined at the reals.

If you want to debate the above, then I will ask you the following:

how do you define for example

? or

?

Sorry, definitions via decimal expansions won't cut it, because decimal expansions suffer from non-uniqueness. So, if you tell me for example, take Andrew's or Gottfried's or your method and "input" 0.666... or 0.6363..., and then see what the function outputs, this is already suffering badly as a definition.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents - by UVIR - 09/30/2007, 07:33 PM

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Tetration research: 1986 - 1991 Daniel 0 175 03/20/2020, 02:47 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  umbral and tetration tetration101 3 373 03/02/2020, 06:28 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  tetration from alternative fixed point sheldonison 22 32,221 12/24/2019, 06:26 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Constructing real tetration solutions Daniel 4 996 12/24/2019, 12:10 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 950 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  I need somebody to help me clarifiy the elementary knowledge for tetration Ember Edison 13 5,060 08/26/2019, 01:44 PM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 3,031 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Minimum axioms to extend tetration Daniel 0 569 07/21/2019, 11:38 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Critic of Tetration.org Daniel 2 1,083 07/21/2019, 01:32 AM
Last Post: Daniel
  Dimesional analysis and tetration tetration101 1 1,073 06/23/2019, 08:43 PM
Last Post: Chenjesu



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)