Login

Cherrina_Pixie · 06/14/2011, 04:22 AM

(06/08/2011, 11:47 PM)JmsNxn Wrote: However, I am willing to concede the idea of changing from base eta to base root 2.

That is to say if we define:

$\vartheta(a,b,\sigma) = \exp_{2^{\frac{1}{2}}}^{\circ \sigma}(\exp_{2^{\frac{1}{2}}}^{\circ -\sigma}(a) + h_b(\sigma))\\\\ [tex]h_b(\sigma)=\left{\begin{array}{c l} \exp_{2^{\frac{1}{2}}}^{\circ -\sigma}(b) & \sigma \le 1\\ \exp_{2^{\frac{1}{2}}}^{\circ -1}(b) & \sigma \in [1,2] \end{array}\right.$

This will give the time honoured result, and aesthetic necessity in my point of view, of:
$\vartheta(2, 2, \sigma) = 2\,\,\bigtriangleup_\sigma\,\, 2 = 4$ for all $\sigma$ .

I like this also because it makes $\vartheta(a, 2, \sigma)$ and $\vartheta(a, 4, \sigma)$ potentially analytic over $(-\infty, 2]$ since 2 and 4 are fix points.

I also propose writing

$a\,\,\bigtriangle_\sigma^f\,\,b = \exp_f^{\circ \sigma}(\exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(a) + h_b(\sigma))\\\\ [tex]h_b(\sigma)=\left{\begin{array}{c l} \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(b) & \sigma \le 1\\ \exp_f^{\circ -1}(b) & \sigma \in [1,2] \end{array}\right.$

I thought about this for some time and considered interpolation between arithmetic mean and geometric mean, coming to a rather curious result. The 'mean' function with $\sigma = -1$ fails to satisfy a property of means: $mean(c*r_1,c*r_2,c*r_3, ..., c*r_n) = c*mean(r_1,r_2,r_3, ..., r_n)$

Define $M_f^\sigma(r_1,r_2,r_3, ..., r_n) = \exp_f^{\circ \sigma}\left(\frac{\exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_1) + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_2) + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_3) + ... + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_n)}{n}\right),\ \sigma \le 1$ This yields the arithmetic mean for $\sigma = 0$ and the geometric mean for $\sigma = 1$ .
For $\sigma = -1$ ,

$M_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(1,2) = \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ -1}\left(\frac{\exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ 1}(1) + \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ 1}(2)}{2}\right) = \log_{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2} + 2}{2}\right) \approx 1.5431066$
$M_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(3,6) = \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ -1}\left(\frac{\exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ 1}(3) + \exp_{\sqrt{2}}^{\circ 1}(6)}{2}\right) = \log_{\sqrt{2}}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}^3 + 8}{2}\right) \approx 4.8735036 \ \approx \ 3.15824 * M_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(1,2) \ \not= \ 3.00000*M_{\sqrt{2}}^{-1}(1,2)$

So it's not a 'true mean' in the sense that the scalar multiplication property fails. This result makes me doubt that the property may be satisfied for $0 < \sigma < 1$ . Is there a way to rectify this issue, i.e. find a solution $(f,\sigma)$ with $f > 1$ and $0 < \sigma < 1$ such that the property is satisfied?

***bo198214*** · 06/14/2011, 09:17 AM

(06/14/2011, 04:22 AM)Cherrina_Pixie Wrote: I thought about this for some time and considered interpolation between arithmetic mean and geometric mean, coming to a rather curious result. The 'mean' function with $\sigma = -1$ fails to satisfy a property of means: $mean(c*r_1,c*r_2,c*r_3, ..., c*r_n) = c*mean(r_1,r_2,r_3, ..., r_n)$

Define $M_f^\sigma(r_1,r_2,r_3, ..., r_n) = \exp_f^{\circ \sigma}\left(\frac{\exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_1) + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_2) + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_3) + ... + \exp_f^{\circ -\sigma}(r_n)}{n}\right),\ \sigma \le 1$ This yields the arithmetic mean for $\sigma = 0$ and the geometric mean for $\sigma = 1$ .

I just want to add the observation that:
$M^1$ and $M^2$ satisfy the modified property
$M(r_1^c,\dots,r_n^c)=M(r_1,\dots,r_n)^c$ .

***bo198214*** · (This post was last modified: 06/14/2011, 10:04 AM by bo198214.)

(06/14/2011, 09:17 AM)bo198214 Wrote: I just want to add the observation that:
$M^1$ and $M^2$ satisfy the modified property
$M(r_1^c,\dots,r_n^c)=M(r_1,\dots,r_n)^c$ .

And if we define
$x (t) y = \exp^{\circ t}(\log^{\circ t}(x)+\log^{\circ t}(y))$

then we have for integers (and even non-integers) s=t and s=t-1:

$M^s(r_1 (t) c, \dots, r_n (t) c) = M^s(r_1,\dots,r_n) (t) c$

JmsNxn · (This post was last modified: 06/14/2011, 09:53 PM by JmsNxn.)

Actually, I think if we use logarithmic semi-operators to notate this:

if $\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\,\sum_{n=N}^{R} f(n)= f(N)\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\,f(N+1)\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\,...\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\, f( R )$

then:
$M^{\sigma}(r_1,...,r_n) = (\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\,\sum_{c=1}^{n}\,r_c)\,\,\bigtriangledown_{1+\sigma} \,\,n$ for $\R (\sigma) \le 1$

This means, that multiplication isn't spreadable across [0,1], but logarithmic semi-operator multiplication is spreadable across [0,1]. Or put mathematically:

$M^{\sigma}(r_1,...,r_n)\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\, a=M^{\sigma}(r_1\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\, a,...,r_n\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma}\,\, a)$
and
$ M^{\sigma}(r_1,...,r_n)\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma + 1} \,\, a = M^{\sigma}(r_1 \,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma + 1} \,\, a,...,r_n\,\,\bigtriangleup_{\sigma + 1} \,\, a)$

This should hold for complex numbers. Given the restriction on sigma. bo pretty much already noted this though, I just thought I'd give it a go $Tongue$ .

I'm not sure if there's anything really interesting you can do with these averages.

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread		Author	Replies	Views	Last Post
	Has anyone solved iterations of z+Γ(z)?	Leo.W	5	1,836	01/07/2022, 08:15 AM Last Post: JmsNxn
	Intresting ternary operations ?	tommy1729	0	3,359	06/11/2015, 08:18 AM Last Post: tommy1729
	Change of base formula using logarithmic semi operators	JmsNxn	4	12,890	07/08/2011, 08:28 PM Last Post: JmsNxn
	book: the theory of fractional powers of operators	bo198214	2	9,319	06/22/2010, 07:30 PM Last Post: Ztolk
	f( f(x) ) = exp(x) solved ! ! !	tommy1729	25	35,265	02/17/2009, 12:30 AM Last Post: tommy1729
	Rational sums of inverse powers of fixed points of e	jaydfox	14	27,096	11/23/2007, 08:22 AM Last Post: bo198214
	A more consistent definition of tetration of tetration for rational exponents	UVIR	21	37,237	10/21/2007, 10:47 PM Last Post: UVIR