Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
A fundamental flaw of an operator who's super operator is addition
#1
Well I came across this little paradox when I was fiddling around with logarithmic semi operators. It actually brings to light a second valid argument for the aesthetic nature of working with base root (2) and furthers my belief that this is the "natural" extension to the ackermann function.

Consider an operator who is commutative and associative, but above all else, has a super operator which is addition. this means



or in general


The contradiction comes about here:




right now:



However, if you count em, there are exactly eight a's, not six.

Voila! this proves you cannot have an associative and commutative operator who's super operator is addition.


The operator which obeys:

but who's super operator is not addition is, you've guessed it, logarithmic semi operator base root (2)

or

Reply
#2
yes that works for 2 a's ...

but not for 3 ...

:s
Reply
#3
(09/05/2011, 11:50 PM)tommy1729 Wrote: yes that works for 2 a's ...

but not for 3 ...

:s

that's my point!

You cannot have an operator that works for all n a's, only at fix points

Quote:Voila! this proves you cannot have an associative and commutative operator who's super operator is addition.
reread my proof.

the one that works for three is:

Reply
#4
pretty ingenious,
PS : About the successor, although some consider the successor operator as the one that comes before addition, but the thing is that is unary. Other way could oe consider the Min operator as in "tropical geometry, but not all like that operator since not produce a change about the initial values...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tropical_geometry
http://staffwww.fullcoll.edu/dclahane/co...entalk.pdf

...probably would be nice a half-operation between Min operation and Addition operation
Reply
#5
Shouldn't this follow directly from the fact that addition is axiomatic? If such a hyperoperation existed below addition, then you'd be contradicting the existence of the axioms upon which you've constructed addition in the first place to even define real numbers.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Is bugs or features for fatou.gp super-logarithm? Ember Edison 10 1,923 08/07/2019, 02:44 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Can we get the holomorphic super-root and super-logarithm function? Ember Edison 10 2,405 06/10/2019, 04:29 AM
Last Post: Ember Edison
  Tetration and Sign operator tetration101 0 333 05/15/2019, 07:55 PM
Last Post: tetration101
  Inverse super-composition Xorter 11 12,078 05/26/2018, 12:00 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  The super 0th root and a new rule of tetration? Xorter 4 3,612 11/29/2017, 11:53 AM
Last Post: Xorter
  Solving tetration using differintegrals and super-roots JmsNxn 0 1,806 08/22/2016, 10:07 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Between addition and product ( pic ) tommy1729 4 3,521 07/10/2016, 07:32 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Fundamental Principles of Tetration Daniel 13 12,085 03/16/2016, 09:40 PM
Last Post: Daniel
  The super of exp(z)(z^2 + 1) + z. tommy1729 1 2,462 03/15/2016, 01:02 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Super-root 3 andydude 10 10,222 01/19/2016, 03:14 AM
Last Post: andydude



Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)