Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
simple base conversion formula for tetration
#1
Well I finally decided to look a little deeper at my suggested base conversion, and to my surprise, the formula just popped out at me.

given the definition :



we see instantly:


which works for k = 0 as well since is multiplication.

It's easy now to generate a formula which works for base conversion using these operators. The notation for such is very cumbersome however, therefore I'll write it out step by step for 2, 3, 4.





and which I think the process becomes obvious by this point



and which by generality becomes:

where we are sure to evaluate the highest operator first.

this formula is very easily generalized to include conversion from base to any base
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Nixon-Banach-Lambert-Raes tetration is analytic , simple and “ closed form “ !! tommy1729 11 1,022 02/04/2021, 03:47 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  There is a non recursive formula for T(x,k)? marraco 5 1,155 12/26/2020, 11:05 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Complex Tetration, to base exp(1/e) Ember Edison 7 7,006 08/14/2019, 09:15 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  tommy's simple solution ln^[n](2sinh^[n+x](z)) tommy1729 1 4,077 01/17/2017, 07:21 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 2,567 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Is bounded tetration is analytic in the base argument? JmsNxn 0 2,351 01/02/2017, 06:38 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Extrapolated Faá Di Bruno's Formula Xorter 1 3,504 11/19/2016, 02:37 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  tetration base sqrt(e) tommy1729 2 5,031 02/14/2015, 12:36 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Explicit formula for the tetration to base [tex]e^{1/e}[/tex]? mike3 1 4,454 02/13/2015, 02:26 PM
Last Post: Gottfried
  tetration base > exp(2/5) tommy1729 2 4,792 02/11/2015, 12:29 AM
Last Post: tommy1729



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)