Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Superfunctions in continu sum equations
#1
Superfunctions in continu sum equations

As the title says I will express Superfunctions in an equation involving the continu sum.

First I need to say this post is in the context of real-differentiable functions.

Also we avoid fixpoint issues or assume there is only 1 or 0 on the real line and/or 2 conjugate on the complex plane.

Second I Must say that we need to find a real analytic function g(x) and it is not totally clear or proven what g(x) is and how many g(x) exist ; in other words uniqueness issues. I assume many g(x) exist and I think you will agree because there are many superfunctions.
However I think it makes sense to say there are as many g(x) as analytic solutions to the superfunction. ( in the sense of a continu bijection ).

Intuitively the equation seems logical to me.


Lets take the exponential as example
( but this post/equation is thus in a more general setting )

Let CS ... ds be the notation for Continuum Sum with respect to s.
( inspired by integrals ... because we can express this in terms of integrals ! )

Let x > 0

consider an invertible realvalued f(x) such that
f(x) = g(x) + g(exp(x)) + g(exp^[2](x)) + ... +g(exp^[oo](x))

Now assume f(x) always converges. This implies that g(x) goes to zero for large values of x.

Let T(x) be the functional inverse of f(x).

Now notice

f(x) - f(exp(x)) = g(x)

Such equation looks familar... If g(x) was GIVEN. But here it is not given yet. However if we continue ;

f(x) - f(exp^[2](x)) = g(x) + g(exp(x))

f(x) - f(exp^[s](x)) = CS g(exp^[s-1](x)) d(s-1)

- f(exp^[s](x)) = CS g(exp^[s-1](x)) d(s-1) - f(x)

f(exp^[s](x)) = - CS g(exp^[s-1](x)) d(s-1) + f(x)

exp^[s](x) = T ( - CS g(exp^[s-1](x)) d(s-1) + f(x) )

exp^[s](1) = T ( - CS g(exp^[s-1](1)) d(s-1) + f(1) )

Which seems to completely express the superfunction in terms of familiar calculus once we rewrite CS in terms of integrals and try to solve for g(x).

Its almost like a differential equation.
I think it might even be solvable by brute force iterations of truncations. For instance by taylor series.

I was also intruiged by the idea of derivative ; we know the CP ( continuum product ) is the derivative of sexp and this seems related yet different. Thing is the CP is always(!) the derivative of ANY sexp so setting up that equation seems useless. I hope to do better with this one. But it seems tempting to differentiate (with respect to s) that last equation.

Btw the equation(s) to turn a CS into an integral can be easily found , for instance on wiki or this forum. (This forum also contains a limit form that is well explained (and equivalent) but imho harder to compute.)

Regards

tommy1729
Reply


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Taylor polynomial. System of equations for the coefficients. marraco 17 14,792 08/23/2016, 11:25 AM
Last Post: Gottfried
  Finding continu iteration cycles. tommy1729 2 2,245 03/05/2016, 10:12 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Totient equations tommy1729 0 1,578 05/08/2015, 11:20 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Bundle equations for bases > 2 tommy1729 0 1,579 04/18/2015, 12:24 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Grzegorczyk hierarchy vs Iterated differential equations? MphLee 0 1,874 01/03/2015, 11:02 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  A system of functional equations for slog(x) ? tommy1729 3 4,036 07/28/2014, 09:16 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  partial invariant equations ? tommy1729 0 1,681 03/16/2013, 12:32 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  tetration base conversion, and sexp/slog limit equations sheldonison 44 50,442 02/27/2013, 07:05 PM
Last Post: sheldonison
  superfunctions of eta converge towards each other sheldonison 13 14,734 12/05/2012, 12:22 AM
Last Post: sheldonison
  Equations for Kneser sexp algorithm sheldonison 18 26,469 06/21/2011, 01:48 AM
Last Post: sheldonison



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)