Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Incredible reduction for Hyper operators
Hi everyone. I've been doing some exhaustive research into the Weyl differintegral and I've found a very beautiful approach to solving hyperoperators.

I'll be very frank. so I'll just state the following results:


Is the Weyl differintegral at zero, then I've shown some equivalencies. If is kosher then it is defined for at least the left half plane ending at the line and as well for all and for and for some


As Well we obtain a new expression for which is what I'm going for:

I am currently writing a paper on this. The results are solid. I've checked them very well. I can explain how I got to them, but they take a bit to write up.

So now we say, by the following.

Define the function:

where is an entire function of order zero defined by

Let us assume there exists an analytic continuation of natural hyperoperators (natural z) for natural values of x (in the first argument), and complex arguments in the second argument (in y). And If and both are kosher
then 1/x[z+1]y is kosher

But!!! Since

We see we are only talking about the naturals and the results are EQUIVALENT!!!!!!!

Okay, I know. This is a big if. Essentially you need to prove that the following integral on the right converges for , that for when and that for some . Where is the following function

If this happens and is holomorphic in for all natural . THEN WE HAVE AN ANALYTIC CONTINUATION OF HYPER OPERATORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I have the evaluation that:


Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Thoughts on hyper-operations of rational but non-integer orders? VSO 2 1,633 09/09/2019, 10:38 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Hyper-volume by integration Xorter 0 1,925 04/08/2017, 01:52 PM
Last Post: Xorter
  Hyper operators in computability theory JmsNxn 5 5,852 02/15/2017, 10:07 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Recursive formula generating bounded hyper-operators JmsNxn 0 2,094 01/17/2017, 05:10 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  Rational operators (a {t} b); a,b > e solved JmsNxn 30 49,233 09/02/2016, 02:11 AM
Last Post: tommy1729
  holomorphic binary operators over naturals; generalized hyper operators JmsNxn 15 20,417 08/22/2016, 12:19 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  The bounded analytic semiHyper-operators JmsNxn 2 4,607 05/27/2016, 04:03 AM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  on constructing hyper operations for bases > eta JmsNxn 1 3,550 04/08/2015, 09:18 PM
Last Post: marraco
  Bounded Analytic Hyper operators JmsNxn 25 26,497 04/01/2015, 06:09 PM
Last Post: MphLee
  Hyper operator space JmsNxn 0 2,359 08/12/2013, 10:17 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)