Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Could be tetration if this integral converges
As a note on a similar technique you are applying Mike but trying to keep the vibe much more fractional calculus'y (since it's what I am familiar with) We will try the following function:

We want fairly small

We know that for because

So that .

This function should be smaller then tetration at natural values.

We would get the entire expression for by Lemma 3 of my paper:

Now F(z) will be susceptible to alot of the techniques I have in my belt involving fractional calculus. This Idea just popped into my head but I'm thinking working with a function like this will pull down the imaginary behaviour and pull down the real behaviour.

We also note that

. Which again will be more obvious if you look at the paper, but it basically follows because:


Messages In This Thread
RE: Could be tetration if this integral converges - by JmsNxn - 05/04/2014, 09:06 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Where is the proof of a generalized integral for integer heights? Chenjesu 2 4,956 03/03/2019, 08:55 AM
Last Post: Chenjesu
  [integral] How to integrate a fourier series ? tommy1729 1 5,263 05/04/2014, 03:19 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Some integral transforms related to tetration JmsNxn 0 3,536 05/02/2013, 07:54 PM
Last Post: JmsNxn
  (draft) integral idea tommy1729 0 4,233 06/25/2011, 10:17 PM
Last Post: tommy1729
  Cauchy integral also for b< e^(1/e)? bo198214 14 25,059 04/24/2009, 05:29 PM
Last Post: bo198214

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)