slog_b(sexp_b(z)) How does it look like ?
#5
Well that seems alot like the base change to me at first glance.
Afterall slog is similar to taking many logs and sexp is similar to taking many exponents. Kinda.

Since many believe both 2sinh method and base change are C^oo but not analytic that makes sense too.

Im not very confident about how to prove periodicity of functions that are not analytic !
As often " nonanalytic calculus " has less " tools " then " analytic calculus " so I find it harder.

Has the periodicity for the base change been confirmed ? Or is it not ?
I might have to look at base change again and maybe advise you the same... I think a proof might depend on stuff said about the base change.

I had that idea once too. Not sure why I forgot about it. Maybe doubts.

It seems like a nice thing to investigate.

Although its a big deviant from the Original Problem since it is nowhere analytic ( though I see the connection ).

I have some ideas to find places to read up on this, so when I have the time I might say more.

regards

tommy1729


Messages In This Thread
RE: slog_b(sexp_b(z)) How does it look like ? - by tommy1729 - 04/24/2014, 10:30 PM



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)